Page 451 - Aircraft Stuctures for Engineering Student
P. 451

432  Stress analysis of aircraft components

             and (10.63) (Ref.  1). The resulting  equations  are complex  and require  numerical
             methods of solution.
               Generally, composite structures consist of several laminas with the direction of the
             filaments arranged so that they lie in the directions of the major  loads. Thus, for a
             loading system which comprises two mutually  perpendicular  loads, it  is necessary
             to build  or lay-up  a  laminate with  sufficient plies in  both directions to withstand
             each load. Such an arrangement  is known as a cross-ply  laminate. The analysis of
             multi-ply laminates is complex and is normally carried out using finite difference or
             finite element methods.






             1  Calcote, L. R.,  The Analysis of Laminated Composite Structures, Van Nostrand  Reinhold
                Co., New York, 1969.





             Datoo, M. H., Mechanics  of  Fibrous  Composites, Elsevier Applied Science, London, 1991.





               P.10.1  A  wing  spar  has  the  dimensions  shown  in  Fig.  P.10.1  and  carries  a
             uniformly distributed load of  15 kN/m along its complete length. Each flange has a
             cross-sectional area of  500mm2 with the top flange being horizontal. If the flanges
             are assumed to resist all direct loads while the spar web is effective only in  shear,
             determine the flange loads and the shear flows in the web at sections  1 m and 2m
             from the free end.

               Am.  1 m  from  free  end:  Pu  = 25 kN  (tension),  PL = 25.1 kN  (compression),
             q = 41.7 N/mm.
               2 m  from  free  end:  Pu  = 75 kN  (tension),  PL = 75.4 kN  (compression),
             q = 56.3 N/mm.















                                                             lrn
                                                        c           -1
             Fig. P.10.1
   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456