Page 484 - Aircraft Stuctures for Engineering Student
P. 484

11.5 Constraint of open section beams  465

         Finally, the shear flow distributions are obtained from Eqs (1 1.39), thus
                                -dPBI  -  PAX     sinh X(L - z)
                            41  =-   dz   -  2(2B+A)   coshXL             (1 1.52)
                                aPB2  -  -PAX    sinh X(L - z)
                            q2=--  dz   2(2B+A)    coshXL                 (1 1.53)

         Again we see that each expression for direct stress, Eqs (1 1.47), (11.49) and (1  1.51),
         comprises a term which gives the solution from elementary  theory  together with  a
         correction for the shear lag effect. The shear flows q1 and q2 are self-equilibrating,
         as can be seen from Eqs (1 1.52) and (1 1.53), and are entirely produced by the shear
         lag effect (ql and q2 must be self-equilibrating since no shear loads are applied).


         LcllllllrrrJrwr- I
           11.5  Constraint of open section beams
         Instances  of  open  section  beams  occurring  in  isolation  are  infrequent  in  aircraft
         structures.  The  majority  of  wing  structures  do,  however,  contain  cut-outs  for
         undercarriages, inspection panels and the like, so that at these sections the wing is
         virtually an open section beam. We saw in Chapter  10 that one method  of analysis
         for such cases is to regard  the  applied  torque  as being resisted  by  the  differential
         bending  of the front and rear spars in the cut-out bay. An alternative approach is
         to consider the cut-out bay as an open section beam built-in at each end and subjected
         to a torque. We shall now investigate the method of analysis of such beams.
           If such a beam is axially unconstrained and loaded by a pure torque T the rate of
         twist is constant along the beam and is given by
                                      d0
                                T = GJ-    (from Eq. (9.59))
                                      dz
         We also showed in Section 9.6 that the shear stress varies linearly across the thickness
         of the beam wall and is zero at the middle plane (Fig. 11.22). It follows that although
         the beam and the middle plane warp (we are concerned here with primary warping),
         there is no shear distortion of the middle plane. The mechanics of this warping are
         more  easily  understood  by  reference  to  the  thin-walled  I-section  beam  of  Fig.
         11.23(a). A plan  view  of the beam (Fig.  11.23(b)) reveals that the middle plane of
         each  flange remains  rectangular,  although twisted,  after  torsion. We  now  observe
         the effect of applying a restraint to one end of the beam. The flanges are no longer
         free  to  warp  and  will  bend  in  their  own  planes  into the  shape shown  in  plan  in
                                  @--



                       Middle plane





         Fig. 11.22  Shear stress distribution across the wall of an open section beam subjected to torsion.
   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489