Page 220 -
P. 220

200   CHAPTER 4 LINEAR PROGRAMMING APPLICATIONS



                                                                      Output Measures
                                    Restaurant    Weekly Profit   Market Share (%)   Growth Rate (%)
                                    London           £3 800             25                  8.0
                                    Manchester       £4 600             32                  8.5
                                    Edinburgh        £4 400             35                  8.0
                                    Bristol          £6 500             30                 10.0
                                    Cardiff          £6 000             28                  9.0



                                    a. Develop a linear programming model that can be used to evaluate the performance of
                                      the Manchester Quick and Easy restaurant.
                                    b. Solve the model.
                                    c. Is the Manchester Quick and Easy restaurant relatively inefficient? Discuss.
                                    d. Where does the composite restaurant have more output than the Manchester
                                      restaurant? How much less of each input resource does the composite restaurant
                                      require when compared to the Manchester restaurant?
                                    e. What other restaurants should be studied to find suggested ways for the Manchester
                                      restaurant to improve its efficiency?
                                20 Reconsider the Leisure Air problem from Section 4.5. The demand forecasts shown in
                                    Table 4.16 represent Leisure Air’s best estimates of demand. But, because demand cannot
                                    be forecasted perfectly, the number of seats actually sold for each origin-destination-
                                    itinerary fare (ODIF) may turn out to be smaller or larger than forecasted. Suppose that
                                    Leisure Air believes that economic conditions have improved and that their original forecast
                                    may be too low. To account for this possibility, Leisure Air is considering switching the
                                    Boeing 737–400 aeroplanes with Boeing 757–200 aeroplanes that Leisure Air has available
                                    in other markets. The Boeing 757–200 aeroplane has a seating capacity of 158.
                                    a. Because of scheduling conflicts in other markets, suppose that Leisure Air is only able
                                      to obtain one Boeing 757–200. Should the larger plane be based in Glasgow or in
                                      Edinburgh? Explain.
                                    b. Based upon your answer in part (a), determine a new allocation for the ODIFs. Briefly
                                      summarize the major differences between the new allocation using one Boeing 757–200
                                      and the original allocation summarized in Figure 4.11.
                                    c. Suppose that two Boeing 757–200 aeroplanes are available. Determine a new allocation
                                      for the ODIF’s using the two larger aeroplanes. Briefly summarize the major differences
                                      between the new allocation using two Boeing 757–200 aeroplanes and the original
                                      allocation shown in Figure 4.11.
                                    d. Consider the new solution obtained in part (b). Which ODIF has the highest bid price?
                                      What is the interpretation for this bid price?




                      CASE PROBLEM 1 Planning an Advertising Campaign


                          he Cossack Grill is an upscale restaurant  television, Internet and newspaper advertisements.
                      T located in St. Petersburg. To help plan an adver-  The budget has been set at 279 000 Roubles.
                      tising campaign for the coming season, the restau-  In a meeting with the restaurant’s management
                      rant’s management team hired the advertising firm  team, HJ consultants provided the following informa-
                      of Hartman & Jablinsky (HJ). The management team  tion about the industry exposure effectiveness rating
                      requested HJ’s recommendation concerning how  per ad, their estimate of the number of potential new
                      the advertising budget should be distributed across  customers reached per ad and the cost for each ad.





                Copyright 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has
                      deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225