Page 450 -
P. 450

430   CHAPTER 10 INVENTORY MODELS


                                     possible losses, c o ¼ E10 and c u ¼ E20, by the probability of obtaining the loss, we
                                     can compute the expected value of the loss, or simply the expected loss (EL),
                                     associated with the order quantity alternatives. So:
                                                  ELðQ ¼ 501Þ¼ c o Pðdemand   500Þ¼ E10ð0:50Þ¼ E5

                                                  ELðQ ¼ 500Þ¼ c u Pðdemand > 500Þ¼ E20ð0:50Þ¼ E10
                                     Based on these expected losses, do you prefer an order quantity of 501 or 500 pairs
                                     of shoes? Because the expected loss is greater for Q ¼ 500, and because we want to
                                     avoid this higher cost or loss, we should make Q ¼ 501 the preferred decision. We
                                     could now consider incrementing the order quantity one additional unit to Q ¼ 502
                                     and repeating the expected loss calculations.
                                       Although we could continue this unit-by-unit analysis, it would be time-consuming
                                     and cumbersome. We would have to evaluate Q ¼ 502, Q ¼ 503, Q ¼ 504 and so on,
                                     until we found the value of Q where the expected loss of ordering one incremental
                                     unit is equal to the expected loss of not ordering one incremental unit; that is, the
                                     optimal order quantity Q* occurs when the incremental analysis shows that:




                                                                ELðQ þ 1Þ¼ ELðQ Þ                   (10:29)
                                     When this relationship holds, increasing the order quantity by one additional unit has
                                     no economic advantage. Using the logic with which we computed the expected losses
                                     for the order quantities of 501 and 500, the general expressions for EL(Q* + 1) and
                                     EL(Q*) can be written:




                                                           ELðQ þ 1Þ¼ c o Pðdemand   Q Þ            (10:30)


                                                               ELðQ Þ¼ c u Pðdemand > Q Þ           (10:31)
                                     Because we know from basic probability that:




                                                        Pðdemand   Q Þþ Pðdemand > Q Þ¼ 1           (10:32)
                                     we can write:




                                                        Pðdemand > Q Þ¼ 1   Pðdemand   Q Þ          (10:33)
                                     Using this expression, Equation (10.31) can be rewritten as:




                                                           ELðQ Þ¼ c u ½1   Pðdemand   Q ފ         (10:34)
                                     Equations (10.30) and (10.34) can be used to show that EL(Q*+1) ¼ EL(Q*)
                                     whenever:


                                                      c o Pðdemand   Q Þ ¼ c u ½1   Pðdemand   Q ފ  (10:35)







                Copyright 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has
                      deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455