Page 231 - An Introduction to Political Communication Third Edition
P. 231

COMMUNICATING POLITICS

                effort. It was very much a PR show – to show the Fleet leaving,
                both for British opinion, to rally them behind the ships and as an
                expression of power for world opinion and, of course, the enemy’
                (ibid., p. 19).
                  For  the  reporting  of  good  news,  then,  the  media  were  most
                welcome and were treated accordingly. Beyond this role as trans-
                mitters of symbolic demonstrations of military power, the media
                were also used to confuse and ‘disinform’ the enemy. When, for
                example, landings on the Falklands were being prepared, misleading
                information was leaked to the media, thence to the public and, of
                course, the Argentinians.
                  Whether or not one agrees with the ‘justness’ of the Falklands
                War and the government’s information policy during it, there is no
                doubt,  as  Robert  Harris  concludes,  ‘that  in  many  respects  the
                British people were not given the facts during the Falklands war.
                Information  was  leaked  out  slowly  and  often  reluctantly  by  the
                Ministry of Defence; rumours were allowed to circulate unchecked;
                and  the  British  authorities  frequently  used  the  media  as  an
                instrument with which to confuse the enemy’ (1983, p. 92). Such
                tactics may or may not have contributed to British military success
                in the Falklands, but they certainly helped to revive the political
                fortunes  of  the  Thatcher  government,  which  went  on  to  win
                landslide  general  election  victories  in  1983  and  1987.  In  this
                sense, the conflict – and media reportage of it – had major political
                ramifications.
                  Harris also notes that ‘the Falklands conflict may well prove the
                last war in which the armed forces are completely able to control
                the movements and communications of the journalists covering it.
                Technology has already overtaken the traditional concepts of war
                reporting’  (ibid.,  p.  150).  This  prediction  has  turned  out  to  be
                wrong. In the next section we consider a succession of conflicts,
                culminating in the Gulf War of 1991, which demonstrate that the
                control of media coverage of military conflict for political purposes
                has increased, rather than decreased, since the Falklands War. The
                success of the Thatcher government in controlling media images of
                the Falklands War was not an anachronism but the beginning of a
                trend.

                                 The Gulf and other wars

                For the US government of Ronald Reagan, still smarting from the
                perceived  mistakes  of  the  Vietnam  War,  British  media  policy  in


                                           210
   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236