Page 266 - An Introduction to Political Communication Third Edition
P. 266

INDEX

               Glasgow University Media Group  Heffernan, R. and Marqusee, M.
                 (GUMG) 209, 231(9/5n)         152, 154
               Goldenberg, E. 164, 168, 176  hegemonic model,
               Goodman, E. 85–6                consent/authority mix 61–2, 64;
               Gorbachev, M. 189, 190,         criticisms of 64–6; dominant
                 196–7                         ideological perspective 63; and
               Gore, A. 137–8                  impartiality 63; and
               Gould, P. 122, 153, 154         manufacture/sustainment of
               Government Information Service  support 63; and pro–systemic
                 (GIS) 158–9, 160              bias of media 64;
               Graber, D. 3, 4                 propaganda/flexibility of media
               Gramsci, A. 62                  64
               Gray, E. 190                  Hencke, D. 230(7/8n)
               Greater London Council (GLC)  Herd, P. 121
                 121–3                       Herman, E. 195
               Greenaway, J. et al. 43, 53   Heseltine, M. 177
               Greenham Common 176           Hetherington, A. et al. 83
               Greenpeace 179–80             Hewitt, P. 152, 154
               Grenada 211–12                Hezbollah 10
               Gripsund, J. 19, 55           HIV/AIDS 53
               Grundy, T. 231(9/3n)          Hollywood 191–3, 195
               Guardian 80, 82               Hooper, A. 199
               Gulf War 193, 199, 212; and   Hughes, C. and Wintour, P. 122,
                 acceptance of incubator story  153
                 219; babies, incubators, black  Humphrys, J. 88, 139
                 propaganda 216–18, 219;
                 consensus of Allied motivation  Ignatieff, M. 121
                 215–16; criticisms of media in  image, effect of television on 36;
                 214–15; environmental factors  influence of camera angle on 36;
                 213; hyperreality of 218;     management of 134–5, 147–50;
                 journalistic access to 213–14;  manipulation of 35–6, 40;
                 major protagonists in 212;    personal 148–50, 153–4;
                 military success in 214;      positive/negative 132; rising
                 objectives of 212–13          importance of 39–40; and use of
                                               advertising 36–8, 103
               Habermas, J. 19, 22, 90       Independent Television
               Hague, W. 117, 156              Commission: Code of Practice
               Haines, J. 159                  110
               Hall, S. 31, 228(3/2n); et al. 77–8,  Independent Television (ITV) 67–8,
                 164, 167–8, 227(1/3n)         85
               Hallin, D. 62, 64, 204, 229(4/8n)  information management 135;
               Hamas 10                        definition of 157;
               Hanna, V. 89                    establishment of 157–8;
               Harris, R. 158, 160–1, 206, 207,  pro-active 7, 158–9
                 208, 210                    Ingham, B. 80, 81, 158–61, 162
               Hart, R.P. 96, 145, 228(3/7n)  internal communication 135,
               Hartley, J. 55                  151–2; and campaign
               Hattersley, R. 80               (mis)management 152–4;
               Healey, D. 90, 152              confusion/failure in 152;
               Heath, E. 112, 170, 173         coordination of 152–3,


                                          245
   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271