Page 248 - Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes, Third Edition
P. 248

Electric Power = P  = Output power/ξ  = (49.1)/(0.90) = 54.6 kW
                                                                                      dr
                                                               dr
                                                Yearly Cost = (54.6)(0.06)(24)(365)(0.95) = $27,200/yr
                          e.   Same as Part (d) with steam driven compressor. For 10 barg steam with exhaust at 0 barg, Table
                                8.5 provides a steam requirement of 8.79 kg steam/kWh of power. The shaft efficiency is about
                                35% (extrapolating from Figure 8.7).


                                         Steam required by drive = (49.1)(8.79/0.35) = 1233 kg/h (0.34 kg/s)


                                                                                                   –3
                                         Cost of Steam = (1233)(24)(365)(0.95)(28.32 × 10 ) = $290,600/yr
                          f.   P-101: Shaft power is 14.2 kW. From Figure 8.7 the efficiency of an electric drive is about 86%.


                                                          Electric Power = 14.2/0.86 = 16.5 kW


                                                 Yearly Cost = (16.5)(0.06)(24)(365)(0.95) = $8240/yr


                    Note: The cost of using steam to power the compressor is much greater than the cost of electricity even
                    though  the  cost  per  unit  energy  is  much  lower  for  the  steam.  The  reasons  for  this  are  (1)  the
                    thermodynamic  efficiency  is  low,  and  (2)  the  efficiency  of  the  drive  is  low  for  a  small  compressor.
                    Usually steam drives are used only for compressor duties greater than 100 kW.


                    8.7 Cost of Treating Liquid and Solid Waste Streams





                    As environmental regulations continue to tighten, the problems and costs associated with the treatment of
                    waste chemical streams will increase. In recent years there has been a trend to try to reduce or eliminate
                    the  volume  of  these  streams  through  waste  minimization  strategies.  Such  strategies  involve  utilizing
                    alternative process technology or using additional recovery steps in order to reduce or eliminate waste
                    streams. Although waste minimization will become increasingly important in the future, the need to treat

                    waste streams will continue. Some typical costs associated with this treatment are given in Table 8.3, and
                    flowrates can be obtained from the PFD. It is worth noting that the costs associated with the disposal of
                    solid waste streams, especially hazardous wastes, have grown immensely in the past few years, and the
                    values  given  in Table 8.3 are only approximate average numbers. Escalation of these costs should be
                    done with extreme caution.


                    8.8  Evaluation  of  Cost  of  Manufacture  for  the  Production  of  Benzene  via  the

                    Hydrodealkylation of Toluene




                    The cost of manufacture for the production of benzene via the toluene HDA process is given in Example
                    8.10.


                    Example 8.10



                    Calculate the cost of manufacture without depreciation (COM ) for the toluene hydrodealkylation process
                                                                                          d
   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253