Page 81 - Antennas for Base Stations in Wireless Communications
P. 81

54      Chapter Two

                  b.  Because the electrical length of the array increases with frequency, it
                     is often assumed that the elevation-plane directivity of the antenna
                     will also increase with frequency. However, the directivity/frequency
                     relationship is determined by the chosen spacing. The usual specifi-
                     cation requirement is to achieve the largest possible minimum direc-
                     tivity across the required frequency band. This leads to the choice of
                     the largest acceptable inter-tier spacing consistent with acceptable
                     grating lobes, so the directivity may fall with frequency at the upper
                     band edge. Errors in element currents will tend to be higher at band
                     edges than at band center, and the attenuation of the feed system
                     will increase with rising frequency. To ensure that all these effects
                     are understood and taken into account in the array design, the gain
                     budget should be established for the band-edge frequencies as well
                     as for the center frequency (see also item e).
                  c.  A typical array specification will require the first null below the
                     horizon to be filled to at least −18 dB and the two sidelobes above
                     the main beam suppressed to at least −20 dB relative to the main
                     beam. This will result in a beam shaping loss of about 0.3 dB.
                  d.  This factor accounts for the difference between the intended radiat-
                     ing currents, used in the computation of directivity, and those real-
                     ized in practice. This difference may be as small as 0.2 dB, but is
                     often larger, especially at the band edges.
                  e.  The max /mean ratio of the azimuth pattern can most easily be
                     understood by considering an idealized pattern in which the antenna
                     uniformly illuminates a 90° azimuth quadrant. Compared with the
                     power necessary to provide a given field strength over a complete
                     360°, the quadrant antenna will require only one quarter of the input
                     power. The ratio of the area of the whole circle to that of the quadrant
                     pattern is 4. In a general case, if we plot the azimuth pattern in terms
                                                                                  2
                     of relative field, the power in each direction is proportional to the E
                     (i.e., the radius squared) and the area inside the curve is the integral
                        2
                     of r  over 360°. For any azimuth pattern plotted on a relative field
                     scale, the numerical value of the max /mean power ratio is the ratio
                     of the area of the outer circle (E = 1) to that of the azimuth pattern
                     plotted within it. This relationship is true for any number of tiers
                     in the array, and we can obtain its total directivity by multiplying
                     the (numerical) directivities in the azimuth and elevation planes,
                     calculated separately. Any tendency for the azimuth beamwidth to vary
                     with frequency will cause a change in max /mean ratio that will in turn
                     impact the gain/frequency behavior of the array. The highest array
                     gain will be obtained if the azimuth beamwidth is kept close to the
                     specified minimum value at all frequencies in the operating band.
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86