Page 103 - Applied Petroleum Geomechanics
P. 103

Rock strengths and rock failure criteria  95


              core sample tests in laboratory experiments as described in the previous
              section. However, in most cases core samples are unavailable for laboratory
              testing, and empirical correlations between rock strength, geophysical, and
              petrophysical data can be used for estimation. These correlations usually
              are developed for some specific rock formations based on the relationships
              of laboratory core tests, geophysical data, and petrophysical data. Because
              there are multiple choices of strength correlations for various rock types
              in different geological settings, it is necessary to understand the character-
              istics of the correlations and their range of applicability before applying
              them.

              3.2.1 Empirical equations of rock strengths in shales
              3.2.1.1 From sonic velocity
              In conventional reservoirs, shales make up over 75% of the drilled for-
              mations in the oil and gas industry, and over 70% of the borehole problems
              are related to shale instability (Lal, 1999). The oil and gas industry still fights
              borehole instability problems, particularly for drilling in geologically young
              formations of shales (weak shales), for example, in Tertiary and Cretaceous
              shales of the Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea, and the Gulf of Guinea. For
              evaluating wellbore stability and sand production, rock strength is one of
              the most important parameters. Some correlations were obtained using rock
              physical data (P-wave velocity (V p ), or equivalently, interval transit time
              (Dt ¼ 1/V p )), which were directly measured from sonic logs to relate to
              laboratory-measured rock strengths. Using an extensive shale database, Lal
              (1999) developed the following shale strength correlations tied only to
              compressional sonic velocity mainly for high porosity Tertiary shales in the
              Gulf of Mexico:

                                                  p  ffiffiffiffiffi
                                     c ¼ 5ðV p   1Þ= V p                  (3.4)
                                  sin 4 ¼ðV p   1Þ=ðV p þ 1Þ              (3.5)
                 Based on Eqs. (3.4) and (3.5), the UCS can be obtained:

                            UCS ¼ 10ðV p   1Þ¼ 10ð304:8=Dt   1Þ           (3.6)
              where the cohesion (c) and the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) are in
              MPa; the angle of internal friction (4) is in degrees; the compressional
              sonic velocity (V p ) is in km/s; and the transit time (Dt)is in ms/ft.
                 Through wireline log data and laboratory triaxial compression tests
              of shale samples obtained from deep boreholes from the North Sea,
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108