Page 275 - APPLIED PROCESS DESIGN FOR CHEMICAL AND PETROCHEMICAL PLANTS, Volume 1, 3rd Edition
P. 275

Mechanical Separations                                     247



























                                                            When  a  gas  is  generated  in,  or  passes  through,  a  liquid  (11,  the
                                                            gas,  on  bursting from  the  liquid  surface  (2)  carries with  it a  fine
                                                            spray  of  droplets-liquid  entrainment-which  are  carried upward in
                                                            the rising gas stream (3). As  the gas  passes through the mist elimi-
                                                            nator,  these  droplets impinge on  the extensive surface  of  the wire,
                                                            where  they  are  retained until they coalesce  into  large  drops.  When
                                                            thess  liquid  drops  reach  sufficient size,  they  break  away  from  the
       Figure 4-15.  Details of wire mesh construction. Courtesy of Otto H.   wire  mesh  (4)  and  fall  back  against  the  rising  gas  stream.  In  this
      York co.                                              way,  the  entrained  droplets  are  literally  "wiped  out"  of  the  gas
                                                            which,  freed  from  liquid  entrainment,  (5)  passes  on  unhindered
                                                            through the  mesh.
         For special applications the design of a mist eliminator
       unit  may  actually be  an  assembly in  one casing of wire   Figure 4-16.  Diagram of action of wire mesh in liquid-vapor separa-
                                                            tion. Courtesy of Metal Textile Corp.,  Bulletin ME 9-58.
       mesh  and  fiber  packs/pads  or  in  combination  with
       Chevron style mist elements  (see Figure 417A and 17B
       and -17C.)  This can result in greater recovery efficien-   ditions which will prevail and select a mesh to fit as close
       cies for small particles and for higher flow rates through   to the conditions as possible. The procedure  is outlined
       the combined unit. Refer to the manufacturers for appli-   below:
       cation of these designs.
                                                               Allowable vapor velocity (mesh in horizontal position)
       Mesh Patterns

         There are several types of mesh available, and these are   Va= k
       identified by  mesh  thickness, density, wire diameter and   i i"
       weave pattern. Table 49 identifies most of  the commer-
       cial material now available. The knitted pads are available
       in  any material  that can  be  formed  into  the  necessary   Va  = maximum allowable superficial vapor velocity across inlet
       weaves, this includes: stainless steels, monel, nickel, cop-   face of mesh, ft/sec
       per, aluminum, carbon steel, tantalum, Hastelloy, Saran,   k  = constant based on application, Table 410, average for
       polyethylene, fluoropolymer, and glass multi-filament.    free flowing system = 0.35 for 9-12  lb/cu ft mesh

       Capacity Determination                                pL = liquid density, lb/cu ft
                                                             pv = vapor density, lb/cu ft
         The usual practice in selecting a particular mesh for a
       given  service  is  to  determine  the  maximum  allowable
       velocity and from this select a vessel diameter. In the case   For other mesh densities, use k(52) of 0.4 for 5 lb/cu
       of  existing vessels  where  mesh  is  to  be  installed,  the   ft mesh  (high capacity), and 0.3 for plastic mesh such as
       reverse procedure is used, i.e., determine the velocity con-   Teflon@ and polypropylene.
   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280