Page 216 - Applied Process Design For Chemical And Petrochemical Plants Volume II
P. 216

Distillation                                         205



























                                                                                 Figure 8-147.  Vapor  and  liquid rates for tray
                                                                                 activation; perforated trays, no downcorners.
                                                                              0   Compiled from  data  of Sutherland [69]  and
                                    L, Liquid  Aafe,  Ibs./hr.(sq.ft. Active fray)   Myers [47.


             Efficiency appears to fall off significantly for open tray   trays  of  Figure  8-146  the  v,  refers  to  the  area  of
           areas  above  30%. The  higher  efficiencies  are  usually   active tray limits.  If  the  minimum rates are more
           obtained in the 2&23%  range of open hole area [47].       than  20% below the maximum,  the  smaller hole
             Higher efficiencies are obtained for operating condi-    sizes and open areas should be selected.
           tions within 8595% of the tray flood point.              4. Select a design hole vapor rate, v,,  of  1.25 to  1.5
                                                                      times  the  minimum values of  the plate activation
           Flood Point                                                point, or about 25% below the hole velocity at flood
                                                                      conditions.
             At the flood point, liquid continues to flow down the col-   5. Check the number of holes required at each maxi-
           umn,  but  builds  up  at  a  greater  rate  from  tray  to  tray.   mum rate to determine if the required holes can be
           Sutherland E691  demonstrated that flooding moves up the   placed in the tower area.
           column from the point of origin. For this reason it is impor-   Use Figure 8-144 to aid in the determination. If
           tant to design perforated trays without downcomers with    more plate area is required than is available, back-
           extra care, as changing internal rates are quickly reflected   calculate  the  necessary  maximum  hole  velocity.
           in performance if  the proper hole requirements are not    Check if this is  reasonable  (say not over twice the
           met. They are a useM tray for steady state operations.     minimum). If so, the diameter is still acceptable; or
                                                                      change  the  hole  spacing to  allow more  or  fewer
           nay Designs and Layout                                     holes  to  be  placed  in  the  given  diameter of  the
                                                                      tower. Use limiting values previously given on hole
              1. Establish a tower design diameter using the Souders-   spacing.
                Brown method or the relation of Hunt, both given    6. Calculate the total wet tray pressure drop, using an
                previously.                                           assumed height of clear liquid on the tray of 0.5-in.
              2. Determining the vapor and liquid rates in the tower   minimum to 4in. maximum  (1 to 2-in.  are usual
                at all possible critical points of change. The antici-   values).
                pated  maximum  and  minimum  values  must  be      7. Determine height of aerated liquid on the tray, hd.
                defined.                                                If  foaming characteristics of  the  system are less
              3. Determine the values of  the plate activation veloci-   than air-water, results will  be  conservative. For sys-
                ties (or load points), Fh2, for the minimum as well as   tems tending to greater foam and bubbles than the
                maximum  liquid  loads at top  and  bottom  of  the   air-water system, approximate a value of ha] by mul-
                tower and any intermediate points exhibiting signif-   tiplying calculated value by 2, or 3 or known relative
                icant change in flow rates. For partial column area   relationship.
   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221