Page 222 - Applied Process Design For Chemical And Petrochemical Plants Volume II
P. 222

Distillation                                          21 1

           Overall Tray Pressure Drop:                           municate with the final designer/manufacturer and inter-
                                                                 pret the significance of the final results, and (2) be capa-
           h, = hh + hl = 1.77 + 2.33 = 4.3 in. liquid           ble  of  preparing  approximate  designs  for  preliminary
                                                                 information and to develop calculated results to compare
           Froth Height:                                         with the final designs of others. The designs developed by
                                                                 the methods/procedures  presented here are considered
           h,   = 1.15 in. liquid, (see calculation above)       reliable for these purposes, and even as final designs, pro-
                                                                 vided  there  are  actual process  data  and  experience  to
           Using F-Factor, determine p and I$ from Figure 8-149.   compare with.
                                                                   Capps [ 1881 compares valve and sieve tray performance
           at F,,  = 1.04, then: p = 0.61 and I$ = 0.22
                                                                 as related to capacity and flooding. Also see sieve tray sec-
                                                                 tion presented earlier in this chapter.
           hl = 2.53 in. liquid. (see calculation above)
                                                                   Capps El881  examines sieve and valve tray capacity per-
           Calculate froth height, hr:                           formance and Figure 8-151 [188] k offered for preliminary
                                                                 column sizing or for determining whether a debottleneck-
           hf = hI/@ = 2..53/0.22 = 11.5 in.                     ing study is justified. The correlation for flooding, tray rat-
                                                                 ing, and design of a tray are all based on the capacity factor,
            Klein E2011 refers to Thorngren [206,207] but suggests   CT, equation (Souders and Brown  [68] by Capps [ 1881).
           that  this  proposed  valve  tray  flooding  is  reasonably   At total reflux (L/V)  = 1) Capps found several points in
           involved, although considered useful.                 the FRI data that corresponded with this [241] definition
                                                                 of  ultimate  capacity, i.e.,  the  liquid  and  vapor  load  at
          Proprietary Designs                                    which any increase in either liquid or vapor would induce
                                                                 flooding by at least one of the following mechanisms:
            The design engineer cannot adequately design a valve
           tray that includes the operating valves and expect to have   1. Figure  8-151  shows capacity factor  (Souders-Brown
          reliable performance. The proper approach is to assemble   velocity) versus system factor  (pressure, in  this case
          all of the required system/column operating performance    for hydrocarbons) with L/Y as a parameter. In Figure
          requirements and then turn the problem over to a manu-     8-151 the predicted ultimate capacity for a hydrocar-
          facturer who has tested its own valve designs and is capa-   bon  is  obtained by  reading  the  capacity factor  at
          ble of predicting reliable performance. The manufacturer   incipient flood for a given pressure at a given reflux
           can then provide a hydraulic design for the tray, as well as   ratio, L/V.  This Souders-Brown velocity then can be
           the expected performance of the entire column/tray sys-   used to predict the maximum load achievable for a
          tem. The major manufacturer/designs are Nutter Engi-       given column diameter, or, the minimum tower area
          neering,  HdrSCO  Corporation,  [ 2041 ; Koch  Engineering   required for a given load [188, 2411.
           Co., Inc. [203]; Glitsch, Inc. [202], and Norton Chemical   2. Flood factor is  the  usual  design  safety factor  (e.g.,
          Process Products Corporation [233].                        80% of flood, Fflood = 0.80
            There are other manufacturers and engineering com-
          panies that are capable through good computer programs     % = mwp (24/S)0-’/[A~ (hap (Pliq - ~vap))~.’l  (8-320)
          of designing competitive distillation designs, and it is not                                       (8- 321)
          the intent of the above listing to omit any reliable organi-   Vload = mbap/  [ (P~xP) (Pas - PbXp) 1 ’”, ft3/sec
          zation, but to simply list the generally considered major   Or,  CT = vload/(AT)  (24/S)0.5, ft/SeC
          suppliers in the U.S.
            One important point to consider is whether or not the    Or,  % = [6*238 mvap,fl?oa/(Fflood)  (%,flood)  (hap
                                                                          - ~vap) s)0.310.3
          organization  has  obtained  commercial  sized  data  on                                           (8-322)
          equipment designed and fabricated to their designs, and    Capacity factor, CT = Lrlwad/.4~
          how the two results compare. The respective design pro-    \’load  = mMp/ hap  -
          cedure as set forth in each company’s design manual will                       P,,,)   f$/sec      (8 - 323)
          not be outlined in this text, as there is too much detail   Using the Souders-Brown factor:
          necessary to produce a reliable tray performance design,
          and this is included in the manuals. The overall purpose   CT = m,p  (24/s)’.’/[A~  [pbZp (Pliq -   (8-324)
          of  the information presented in this text is to allow the
          designer to (1) become knowledgeable in the component      or,
          details necessary for a proper design and be able to com-   C+ = Vload/(At)  (24/F1)~.~, ft/sec    (8- 325)
   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227