Page 98 - Applied Process Design For Chemical And Petrochemical Plants Volume II
P. 98

Distillation                                           87

             8-6. The resulting nomograph, relating component recov-   Table 87 [ 1411 illustrates the good agreement between
             ery and component relative volatility,  is given in Figure 8-51.   the proposed method with the tray-to-tray calculations for
             This may be used to estimate component recovery in distil-   Case I-High Recovery: 95%  LK recovery in distillate, 94%
             late and bottoms, as follows:                         HK in bottoms; Case 11, Intermediate Recovery: 90% LK
                                                                   recovery in distillate, 85% HK recovery in bottoms; and
             Example 8-28: Estimated Multicomponent Recoveries by   Case I11 Low Recovery: 85% LK recovery in distillate, 81 %
             Yaws’ Method [141] (used  with perdon)                HK recovery in bottoms.

               Component C is to be separated from Component D by   Tray-b y-Tray
             distillation. A 95% recovery of both key components (LK,
             HK) is desired. Saturated-liquid feed composition and rel-   Rigorous tray-by-tray computations for multicomponent
             ative volatilities (at average column conditions) are given   mixtures  of  more  than  three  components can  be  very
             in Table 8-5.                                         tedious, even when made omitting a heat balance. Com-
               Using the graphical short-cut method for component   puters are quite adaptable to this detail and several com-
             distribution, estimate the recovery of non-key components   putation methods are in use.
             in distillate and bottoms.                              The direct-solution method of Akers and Wade  [l] is
             Solution:                                             among several which  attempt to  reduce  the  amount of
                                                                   trial-and-error solutions. This has been accomplished and
                 ai and % desired recovery are plotted for LK and HK   has proven quite versatile in application. The adaptation
                 (ac = 2.3, 95% recovery of C in distillate and aD = I,   outlined modifies the symbols and rearranges some terms
                 95% recovery of  D in bottoms), as shown in Figure   for convenient use  by  the  designer  [3]. Dew  point  and
                 8-50. See Figure 8-51 for working chart. A straight line   bubble  point  compositions and  the  plate  temperatures
                 is then drawn through the two points.             can  be  determined  directly. Constant molal  overflow is
                 Usinga~=3.5,ag=3.0,a~=0.83,aF=0.65,andthe
                                                                   assumed, and relative volatility is held constant over sec-
                 component distribution line, the recovery of non-key   tions of the column.
                 components is  estimated. The results  are  shown  in   Rectifjnng section: reference component is heavy key, xh
                 Table 8-6.


                             Recovery       Recovery
             ComDonent     in distillate,  %   in bottoms. %   Remarks                  Table 87
                 A            99.72           0.28       Graph         Comparison of Yaws, et al. Short Cut Nomograph
                 B            99.20           0.80       Graph
               c (W             95             5        Specified           Results vs. Plate-to-Plate Calculations
               D  (HK)          5             95        Specified                                  Composition Xj
                 E             1.3            98.7       Graph                                       Distillate   Bottoms
                 F             0.22          99.78       Graph                                 Plate to         Plate to
                                                                           Component  Nomograph   plate   Nomograph   plate
                                                                   Case I    A         0.0901   0.0901   0.0002   0.0002
                                  Table 8-6                        High      B         0.3588   0.3391   0.0026   0.0023
                                                                                                0.3190
                                                                                                        0.0269
                                                                                                                0.0278
               Table of Ya Values for Solving Yaws, Fang, and Pate1   recovery   (LK)   0.5197   0.0271   0.5271   0.5271
                                                                                       0.0271
                         Short Cut Recoveries Estimate             (16trays)   D(HK)   0.0041   0.0045   0.3314   0.3308
                                                                             E
                   ~.                                  -
             ~                                                                         0.0002   0.0002   0.1118   0.1118
              YiD   di/bi   YiD  &/bi       &/bi    Ya     &/bi    Case I1             0.0879   0.0880   0.0016   0.0012
             -.       -_ - _-
             99.9   999   96   24.0        0.6670     2   0.02040   Inter-             0.3466   0.3464   0.0128   0.0120
             99.8   499   94   13.7        0.4290    1.0   0.01010   mediate           0.4814   0.4770   0.0683   0.0726
             99.6   249   92   11.5        0.2500    0.8   0.00806   recovery          0.0668   0.0682   0.4839   0.4833
                                                                                                                0.318’7
                                                                                       0.0153
                                                                                                        0.3218
                                                                                                0.0187
             99.4   166   90   9.00        0.1760    0.6   0.00604   (13 trays)        0.0018   0.0018   0.1116   0.1120
             99.2   124   85   5.67        0.1110    0.4   0.00402   Case I11          0.0866   0.0872   0.0034   0.0028
             99.0   99.0   80   4.00       0.0870    0.2   0.00200   ~~  Low           0.3376   0.3395   0.0250   0.0227
             98.5   65.7   70   2.33   6   0.0638    0.1   0.00~00   recovery   C (LK)   0.4561   0.4552   0.1015   0.1027
             98.0   49.0   60   1.50   4   0.0417                  (9trays)   D(HK)    0.0844   0.0839   0.4606   0.4610
             97.0   32.3   50   1.00   3   0.0309                            E         0.0308   G.0295   0.3016   0.3031
             ..  .  .   .- --                 . --  .-     -                 F         0.0045   0.0046   0.1079   0.1077
             Used by permission, Chem. Eng.,Yaw, C. L., et al Jan. 29 (1979), p. 101,   -.      ~      ~.   .. -.   .-
             all rights reserved.                                  Used by permission, Chem. Eng., Yaws, C. L., et a1 Jan. 29 (1979), p. 101,
                                                                   all rights reserved.
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103