Page 296 - Applied statistics and probability for engineers
P. 296

274     Chapter 8/Statistical intervals for a single sample

                                     In our problem situation, because Z = ( X − μ) σ ( /  n)  has a standard normal distribution,

                                   we may write
                                                       ⎧        X − μ     ⎫
                                                      P −  z α/2  Ð  ≤  z α/2 ⎬ = − α1
                                                       ⎨
                                                       ⎩        σ /  n    ⎭
                                   Now manipulate the quantities inside the brackets by (1) multiplying through by σ  n, (2)
                                   subtracting X from each term, and (3) multiplying through by −1. This results in
                                                        ⎧       σ              σ  ⎫
                                                      P X −  z α/2  Ð μ ≤  X+  z α/2  ⎬ = − ≠1           (8-4)
                                                        ⎨
                                                        ⎩        n              n ⎭
                                   This is a random interval because the end-points X ± Z α σ  n  involve the random vari-
                                                                                  /2
                                   able X. From consideration of Equation 8-4, the lower and upper end-points or limits of the
                                   inequalities in Equation 8-4 are the lower- and upper-coni dence limits L and U, respectively.
                                   This leads to the following dei nition.

                  Coni dence Interval
                on the Mean, Variance   If x is the sample mean of a random sample of size n from a normal population with
                                                     2
                            Known     known variance σ , a 100 1( − ≠)% CI on μ is given by
                                                         x −  z / È 2  n ≤ μ ≤  x + z / σ  n         (8-5)
                                                             α
                                                                             α 2
                                      where z /α 2  is the upper 100α /  2 percentage point of the standard normal distribution.



                                   The development of this CI assumed that we are sampling from a normal population. The CI
                                   is quite robust to this assumption. That is, moderate departures from normality are of no seri-
                                   ous concern. From a practical viewpoint, this implies that an advertised 95% CI might have

                                   actual conidence of 93% or 94%.
               Example 8-1     Metallic Material Transition  ASTM Standard E23 dei nes standard test methods for notched
                               bar impact testing of metallic materials. The Charpy V-notch (CVN) technique measures impact
               energy and is often used to determine whether or not a material experiences a ductile-to-brittle transition with decreas-
               ing temperature. Ten measurements of impact energy (J ) on specimens of A238 steel cut at 60ºC are as follows: 64.1,
               64.7, 64.5, 64.6, 64.5, 64.3, 64.6, 64.8, 64.2, and 64.3. Assume that impact energy is normally distributed with σ = 1J.
               We want to ind a 95% CI for μ, the mean impact energy. The required quantities are z α  =  z 0.025  = 1.96,  n = 10,  σ = 1,

                                                                                     / 2
               and x = 64 46. . The resulting 95% CI is found from Equation 8-5 as follows:
                                                         σ              σ
                                                  x −  z α/2  ≤ μ Ð  x +  z α/2
                                                          n              n
                                                                     +
                                                                        .
                                                                  .
                                               .
                                                  − .
                                             64 46 1 96  1  ≤ μ ≤  64 46 1 96  1
                                                         10                 10
                                                       63 84 ≤ μ ≤  65 08
                                                                  .
                                                         .
                 Practical Interpretation: Based on the sample data, a range of highly plausible values for mean impact energy for
               A238 steel at 60°C is 63 84 ≤ μ ≤  65 08J.
                                             .
                                  .
                                     J
                                   Interpreting a Confi dence Interval
                                   How does one interpret a coni dence interval? In the impact energy estimation problem in
                                                            .
                                   Example 8-1, the 95% CI is 63 84 ≤ μ ≤ 65.08, so it is tempting to conclude that μ is within
   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301