Page 230 - Artificial Intelligence for Computational Modeling of the Heart
P. 230

Chapter 6 Additional clinical applications 203




                     output of a computational blood flow model, it inherits the limi-
                     tations of the blood flow model. The definition of the parameters
                     of the blood flow models (both reduced-order and 3D CFD) relies
                     on physiological assumptions, which would also require valida-
                     tion on larger data sets. Such assumptions include for example the
                     mechanical behavior of the vascular wall (rigid, elastic, viscoelas-
                     tic), the use of population-averaged rheological properties of the
                     blood, and so on.


                     6.3 Whole-body circulation

                     6.3.1 Introduction
                        Due to the prohibitive computational cost of spatially de-
                     tailed blood flow models (three-dimensional models in particu-
                     lar), closed loop models of the cardiovascular system rely heavily
                     on lumped parameter modeling techniques, which are based on
                     the analogy between hydraulic and electrical systems. The whole
                     body circulation (WBC) model employed herein, displayed in
                     Fig. 6.11, contains a heart model (left ventricle (LV) and atrium,
                     right ventricle and atrium, valves), the systemic circulation (ar-
                     teries, capillaries, veins), and the pulmonary circulation (arter-
                     ies, capillaries, veins) [453]. Chapter 3 has described established
                     techniques for cardiac image parsing and structure tracking. The
                     anatomical information extracted using these methods, e.g. time-
                     varying ventricular volume, may then be used as input for blood
                     flow computations, as described more extensively in section 2.4.
                        While the lumped parameter model is computationally very ef-
                     ficient (a single forward run requires a runtime of milliseconds),
                     its personalization requires hundreds of forward runs, leading to
                     an overall computation time of 30 to 60 seconds for determin-
                     ing the patient-specific measures of interest. To remove the need
                     for that computationally intensive step, we propose to estimate
                     those measures using a deep neural network. This approach leads
                     to a significant acceleration of computation time, thus making
                     this modeling framework suitable for use in clinical workflows
                     even within an intra-operative setting, where decisions need to be
                     taken in near real-time.

                     6.3.2 Methods
                     6.3.2.1 Traditional personalization framework
                        The WBC model may be run under patient-specific conditions
                     to compute various clinically relevant measures of interest: arte-
                     rial resistance, arterial compliance, dead volume of the left/right
   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235