Page 233 - Artificial Intelligence for Computational Modeling of the Heart
P. 233

206  Chapter 6 Additional clinical applications




                                         6.3.2.2 Deep learning based personalization
                                            Setting up a large medical dataset is often infeasible due to
                                         the costs. As a first step, a database of 10 000 synthetically gen-
                                         erated data samples has been created, reflecting the anatomical
                                         and functional variations representative of healthy and patholog-
                                         ical cases. For the systemic circulation, the following input pa-
                                         rameters were randomly chosen: heart rate, systolic blood pres-
                                         sure, diastolic blood pressure, left ventricular end-diastolic vol-
                                         ume, stroke volume, and left ventricular ejection time. The cycle-
                                         averaged blood pressure was computed from the systolic and
                                         diastolic blood pressures and from the heart. The left ventricu-
                                         lar end-systolic volume was computed from the left ventricular
                                         end-diastolic volume and the stroke volume. A similar approach
                                         was chosen for the right ventricle and the pulmonary circula-
                                         tion. Moreover, the sampling procedure was constrained by a set
                                         of well-defined consistency rules to achieve physiological plausi-
                                         bility [455], e.g., left and right ventricular similar stroke volume,
                                         physiological pulse pressure, etc. The WBC model was then em-
                                         ployed for computing the personalized output measures of inter-
                                         est, thus creating a dataset of training examples.
                                            Two distinct neural networks were defined, to predict time-
                                         independent and time-dependent measures of interest respec-
                                         tively. Following the standard approaches, 8000 randomly selected
                                         data samples were used for training while the remaining 2000 are
                                         used for testing [454]. All input parameters were used as features
                                         for the network, leading to an input feature vector of 9 floating-
                                         point values. For more stable and faster training, features were
                                         rescaled to have the properties of a standard normal distribution
                                         with mean 0 and standard deviation of 1.
                                            A schematic representation of the overall modeling method is
                                         shown in Fig. 6.12: the deep neural networks are trained offline on
                                         the synthetically generated database, and are then applied to pre-
                                         dict measures of interest as a function of patient-specific clinical
                                         data.


                                         6.3.3 Results and discussion
                                            To assess the model performance, the mean absolute percent-
                                         age error, which is typically employed in regression tasks evalu-
                                         ation, is computed (see Table 6.4). Pearson correlation between
                                         predictions and ground-truth was also considered to assess the fi-
                                         delity of the AI model. (See Fig. 6.13.)
                                            Important information for the patient condition can be re-
                                         trieved by assessing the evolution in time of diverse quantities
                                         within a heart cycle. One relevant example is the non-invasive
   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238