Page 464 - Automotive Engineering Powertrain Chassis System and Vehicle Body
P. 464

Decisional architecture    C HAPTER 14.2

           Fraichard, Th, Scheuer, A, and Desvigne, R.  Center, University of California,  Laumond, J.-P, Sekhavat, S and Lamiraux,
             (1999). From Reeds and Shepp’s to  Berkeley, CA, USA.               F. (1998). Guidelines in nonholonomic
             continuous-curvature paths. In  Kanayama, Y, Kimura, Y, Myazaki, F, and  motion planning for mobile robots. In
             Proceedings of the IEEE International  Noguchi, T. (1991). A Stable Tracking  Robot motion planning and control,JP.
             Conference on Advanced Robotics,  Control Method for a Nonholonomic  Laumond (ed.). Lecture Notes in Control
             Tokyo, Japan, pp. 585–90.         Mobile Robot. In: Proceedings of the  and Infonnation Science, 129, pp. 1–53,
           Fujimura, K, and Samet, H. (1989). A  IEEE-RSJ International Workshop on  Springer.
             hierarchical strategy for path planning  Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 2,  Laumond, J.-P, Sime ´on, T, Chatila, R, and
             among moving obstacles. IEEE      Osaka, Japan, pp. 1236–41.        Giralt, G. (1989). Trajectory planning
             Transactions on Robotics and    Kant, K., and Zucker, S. (1986). Toward  and motion control for mobile robts. In:
             Automation, 5(1), 61–9.           efficient trajectory planning: the  Geometry and Robotics, JD. Boissonnat,
           Fujimura, K, and Samet, H. (1990). Motion  path-velocity decomposition.  and JP. Laumond (eds). Lecture Notes in
             planning in a dynamic domain. In:  International Journal of Robotics  Computer Science, 391, pp. 133–49,
             Proceedings of the IEEE International  Research, 5(3): 72–89.       Springer.
             Conference on Robotics and Automation,  Kavraki, L., Svestka, P., Latombe, J,-C. and  Li, Z, and Canny, J.F. (eds) (1992).
             Cincinnatti, OH, USA, pp. 324–30.  Overmars, M.H. (1996). Probabilistic  Nonholonomic Motion Planning. The
           Garnier, Ph, and Fraichard, Th. (1996). A  roadmaps for path planning in high  Kluwer International Series in
             Fuzzy Motion Controller for a Car-Like  dimensional configuration spaces. IEEE  Engineering and Computer Science, 192
             Vehicle. In: Proceedings of the IEEE-RSJ  Transactions on Robotics and  Kluwer Academic Press.
             International Conference on Intelligent  Automation, 12, 566–580.  Lin, L.J. (1993). Reinforcement learning for
             Robots and Systems, vol. 3, Osaka,  Kyriakopoulos, K.J, and Saridis, G.N.  robots using neural networks. Technical
             Japan, pp. 1171–8.                (1991). Collision avoidance of mobile  Report CMU-CS-93–l03 Carnegie
           Gat, E. (1992). Integrating planning and  robots in non-stationary environments.  Mellon University.
             reacting in a heterogeneous       In: Proceedings of the IEEE International  Lozano-Perez, T, and Wesley, M.A. (1979a).
             asynchronous architecture for     Conference on Robotics and Automation.  An algorithm for planning collision-free
             controlling real-world mobile robots. In:  Sacramento, CA, USA, pp. 904–9.  paths among polyhedral obstacles.
             Proceedings of the Tenth National  Latombe, J.-C. (1991). Robot motion  Communications of the ACM 22(10),
             Conference on Artifuial Intelligence,  planning. Kluwer Academic Press.  560–70.
             San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 809–15.                                   McFarland, D. (1987). The Oxford
                                             Laugier, C, and Parent, M. (1999). Towards
           Gat, E. (1997). On Three-Layer      Motion Autonomy for Future vehicles.  Companion to Animal Behaviour.
             Architectures. In Artificial Intelligence  In: Proceedings of the International  Oxford University Press.
             and Mobile Robots, (D. Kortenkamp, RP.  Symposium on Robotics Research,  Moravec, H.P. (1983). The Stanford Cart
             Bonnasso,and R. Murphy, eds). MIT/  Snowbird, USA, Invited paper.   and the CMU Rover. Proceedings of the
             AAAl Press.                                                         IEEE, 71(7), 872–84.
                                             Laugier, C, Fraichard, Th, Paromtchik, I.E,
           Gat, E, Slack, M, Miller, D.P, and Firby, RJ.  and Garnier, Ph. (1998). Sensor-Based  Murray, R.M. (1990). Robotic control and
             (1990). Path Planning and Execution  Control Architecture for a Car-Like  nonholonomic motion planning.
             Monitoring for a Planetary Rover. In:  Vehicle. In Proceedings of the IEEE-RSJ  Research Report UCB/ERL M90/l17.
             Proceedings of the IEEE International  International Conference on Intelligent  Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley,
             Conference on Robotics and Automation,  Robots and Systems, vol. 1, Victoria, BC,  CA, USA.
             vol. 1, Cincinatti, OH, USA, pp. 20–25.  Canada, pp. 216–22.     Nakamura, Y and Mukherjee, R. (1989).
           Harel D, and Pnueli, A. (1985). On the  Laumond, J.-P. (1986). Feasible trajectories  Nonholonomic path planning of space
             development of reactive systems. In:  for mobile robots with kinematic and  robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE
             Logics and Models of Concurrent   environment constraints. In Proceedings  International Conference on Robotics and
             Systems, KR. Apt (ed.). Springer-Verlag,  of the International Conference on  Automation, vol. 2, Scottsdale, AZ,
             pp. 477–98.                       Intelligent Autonomous Systems.   USA, pp. 1050–55.
           Humphrys, M. (1995). W-learning:    Amsterdam, The Netherlands,    Nelson, W.L. (1989). Continuous curvature
             Competition among selfish Q-learners.  pp. 346–54.                   paths for autonomous vehicles. In:
             Technical Report 362 University of  Laumond, J.-P. (1987). Finding  Proceedings of the IEEE International
             Cambridge Computer Laboratory.    collision-free smooth trajectories for  Conference on Robotics and Automation,
             Available at: ftp://ftp.cl.cam.ac.uk/  a nonholonomic mobile robot. In:  vol. 3, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, pp.
             papers/20reports/TR36)2-mh2010006-  Proceedings of the International Joint  1260–64.
             w-learning.0ps.g/.                Conference on Artificial Intelligence,  Nilsson, N.J. (1980). Principles of artificial
           Jacobs, P and Canny, J. (1989). Planning  Milan, Italy,               intelligence. Los Altos, CA, USA,
             smooth paths for mobile robots. In:  pp. 1120–23.                   Morgan Kaufmann.
             Proceedings of the IEEE International  Laumond, J.-P (ed) (1998). Robot motion  Nilsson, N.J. (1984). Shakey The Robot.
             Conference on Robotics and Automation,  planning and control. Lecture Notes in  Technical note 323 AI Center, SRI
             Scotlsdale, AZ, USA, pp. 2–7.     Control and Information Science, 229,  International, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
           Jacobs, P, Heinzinger, G, Canny, J, and  Springer.                 Noreils, F. (1990). Integrating Error
             Paden, B. (1989). Planning guaranteed  Laumond, J.-P, Jacobs, PE, Taix, M, and  Recovery in a Mobile Robot Control
             near-time-optimal trajectories for  Murray, RM. (1994). A motion planner  System. In: Proceedings of the IEEE
             a manipulator in a cluttered workspace.  for nonholonomic mobile robots. IEEE  International Conference on Robotics and
             Research Report ESRC 89–20/RAMP   Trans! Robotics and Automation, 10(5),  Automation, vol. 1, Cincinatti, OH,
             89–15. Engineering Systems Research  577–93.                        USA, pp. 396–401.



                                                                                                      471
   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469