Page 232 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 232

216                         A.  VARVANI-FARAHANI


               In all biaxial tests, the amplitude of (TI  and 02  was identical. Figure 7a compares three in-
             phase  biaxial  fatigue  tests  (Al, B1  and  C1) with  frequency ratios a equal  to  1,  2,  and  3,
             respectively. Histories B3 (a-2)  and C3 (e3) in figure 7c present the out-of-phase test results
             when no mean stress is involved. For both in-phase and out-of-phase  fatigue test series, the
             fatigue  strength  decreases as the  frequency ratio a increases. The  lower fatigue strength  is
             accompanied with a greater fatigue damage due to a greater number of  GI cycles in a block
             loading history as the frequency ratio Q increases. Figure 7c also presents the detrimental effect
             of mean stress on fatigue results when histones B3 and C3 (with no mean stress) are compared
             with histories B4 and C4 (with mean stress). The mean stress influence on fatigue damage can
             also be observed by comparison of Figs 7a and 7b.


             Fatigue life correlation using proposed parameter

             Figures  8a-8d  present  biaxial  fatigue  life  correlations  based  on  the  proposed  parameter
             (equation  (12))  for  in-phase  and  out-of-phase  tests,  which  are  shown  in  Fig.  1.  In  this
             parameter, the normal and shear stress and strain ranges have been calculated from the largest
             stress and strain Mohr's  circles. The total damage accumulation in a block loading history has
             been calculated from the summation of the normal and shear energies on the basis of cycle-by-
             cycle analysis.

              0.1                             J
            L      No me
            D
            I                        0 AI (a=l)                             A2(a=l)
            u    1  (In-phasc
                                     0 Bl(e2)
                                     0 Cl(at3)
           a  t                          006
            e
            0.001 I           I                   0.001             I            !(b)
                1 o4         1 o5          1 o6      1 o4          1 o5         lo6
                       Number of blocks to failure          Number of blocks to failure


              0.1             I               4
                     No mean stress
                                                                             B4 (0~2)
            #  1 (Out-of-phase loading)                 (Out-of-phase loading)   8  c4 (a=3)
            2                          C3 (a=3)
                                                  8
                                                  a
            a                 ;      ,  ,  . , , , ,Ic) i
             0.001   -  '  '                      0.001
                         '
                       '
                I o4          10'          1 o6       1 o4         I os          IO6
                       Number of blocks to failure          Number of blocks to failure
             Fig.  8.  Biaxial  fatigue  life  correlation  for  various  in-phase  and  out-phase  histories  and
             frequency ratios.
               Fig. 8 shows that the proposed fatigue parameter successfully correlates biaxial fatigue lives
             of thin-walled  EN24  steel tubular specimens tested under  in-phase and out-of-phase biaxial
             fatigue stressing where stresses were at different frequencies and included mean values. The
             proposed  parameter  successfully correlates biaxial fatigue lives in  low-cycle-fatigue regime
   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237