Page 254 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 254

238                      C. GAIER AND H. DANNBAUER


               The result quality for combined in phase loading has been moved in the right direction, but
            still it  has not reached the  test  result. Additional improvements are not  possible anymore,
            because a further increase of the fatigue limit at B = 0’ would also change the result for pure
            bending. But the result for bending should not be affected, because it has been already adapted
            to the test result.


            SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK

            The critical plane criterion is proved to deliver good results for brittle materials, but it is shown
            that it has some drawbacks when applying it to ductile ones in combination with out of phase
            loading.  A  method, where  a  new  material parameter has  been  introduced,  is  proposed  to
            overcome these problems. This method can be applied also for stochastic load combinations.
               Additionally a method has been introduced for the assessment of both normal and shear
            stress for stochastic nonproportional loadings. Advantages of the proposed “critical plane -
            critical component” method are:
               - Independency from coordinate system
               - Normal and shear stress and all possible combinations are taken into account.
               - rainflow-counting can be applied for lifetime evaluation without any problems.
               - Applicable for both brittle and ductile materials by specifying cyclic data in dependence on
                the polar angle 8 (S/N-curves, Haigh-diagrams, etc.)
               - The interpolation function between tensiodcompression and torsional load can be adapted
                to test results.
               - Generally applicable for biaxial and triaxial stress (or strain) states
               - Physical interpretation possible as ,,critical component“ of stress vector
             Disadvantages are:
               - High computational effort
               - Sometimes  additional  corrections  are  necessary  for  out-of-phase  loading  (e.g.  for
                tempering steel).
             Alternatively, integral methods can be  applied instead of a maximum  search, to  obtain an
             averaged value for the lifetime. This has been already proved  for infinite lifetime evaluation
             (safety against fatigue limit) of hard metals, e.g. by Zenner et al. [9-10] and Papadopoulos et al.
             [ 121.  For  lifetime prediction till crack initiation, further investigations are necessary.  Future
             efforts take aim to extend the proposed method by integral solution algorithms.
               The methods, as presented here, are based merely on stresses and therefore applicable only
             to the high cycle fatigue domain (HCF) for lifetimes 2 -5000.  Nevertheless, in principle these
             methods could be extended for low cycle fatigue (LCF) too by exchanging stresses for strains
             and introducing suitable damage parameters.  Such strain based fatigue evaluations need to be
             combined with usually extensive non-linear elastic-plastic stress-strain analyses. Experiences in
             this direction are still outstanding.
   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259