Page 430 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 430

414                 K AUBIN, I! QUAEGEBEUR AND S. DEGALLALY


                                a (MPa)
                            450 1
                            400
                            350                                )R+k
                            300
                            250

                                        Ix-IIII  - 1"'quadrant

                            50
                               0         50        100       150
                                                   Number of cycles

            Fig. 1  1. Evolution of the strengthening components during two tension-compression tests.



              Twelve parameters were obtained from the identification of model NLK. This parameter set
            was inserted in the three other models. The eight or nine remaining parameters were identified
            for each non-proportional model using tests with circle, square, hourglass and clover loading
            paths  and  a  strain  amplitude  of  0.5  %.  As  for  model  NLK,  parameter  identification was
            performed with the software SiDoLo [30]. Parameter values obtained for each model are given
            in Tables 7 to 9.
              Figures 12 to  15 show comparison between experiments and simulation for each model, in
            terms of stabilized stress response and cyclic hardeningkoftening behaviour. Figure 16 gives a
            comparison between the equivalent stress amplitudes at the stabilized cycles given by the four
            models and the experimental results.
              In order to represent the hardening increase observed in tension-compression tests as the
            imposed strain amplitude increases, a quasi-linear kinematic hardening component was used in
            model  NLK.  Conversely,  the  tangent  hardening  modulus  for  the  monotonic  curve  is
            overestimated by model NLK. This model is not able to represent the non-proportional cyclic
            hardening and therefore underestimates the stabilized stress response of the circle test.
               Concerning models NP 1, NP2 and TANA, the results in terms of stress response shape and
            stress amplitude fit  well  the  experimental results  for  the  various  loading paths  at  a  strain
            amplitude of 0.5  %. Moreover, these models predict accurately the hardeningkoftening curves
            for  a  circle  path  and  for  a  torsion  path  consecutive to  a  circle  path  with  the  same strain
            amplitude of 0.5 %. Under tension-torsion loadings for the three models, a good agreement is
            observed between the numerical results and the experiment tests used for the identification.
   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435