Page 197 - Biofuels Refining and Performance
P. 197

180   Chapter Six


           generally much more effective than acid catalysts. The reaction was
           performed successfully at both 45 C and 60 C in 4 h, with the production
           of 97% of ME.
             Kruclen et al. [40] have presented a process for conversion of a high-
           melting point palm oil fraction into ethyl esters, which could be used as a
           diesel fuel substitute. The amount of catalyst used (KOH) was 0.1–1%, and
           the reaction was completed rapidly at 80 C with yields of 80–94%, depend-
           ing on the concentration of catalysts. The specific gravity of ethyl ester
           varied from 0.847 to 0.864 with kinematic viscosity of 4.4–4.6 cSt at 40 C.
             Gelbard et al. [41] have determined the yield of transesterification of
                                                  1
           rapeseed oil with methanol and base by  H-NMR (nuclear magnetic
           resonance) spectroscopy. The relevant signals chosen for integration
           are those of methoxy groups in ME at 3.7 ppm (parts per million) (sin-
           glet) and of the  -carbonyl methylene groups present in all fatty ester
           derivatives at 2.3 ppm. The latter appears as a triplet, so accurate meas-
           urements require good separation of this multiple at 2.1 ppm, which is
           related to allylic protons.
             Chadha et al. [42] have studied base-catalyzed transesterification of
           monoglycerides from pongamia oil. They separated monoglyceride frac-
           tions (MG) by column chromatography and then characterized the frac-
                   1
           tions by  H-NMR spectroscopy in deuterated chloroform (CDCl ) and
                                                                      3
           tetramethylsilane (TMS) (see Fig. 6.13). They explain that 1- or 2-MG
           are positional isomers. Consequently, in 1-MG, the methylene protons at




                          O
                         O  H
                   HO
                         OH  (2H)
                                                              O
                                                             O  R
                                                      HO
                                                             OH
                     O
                           OH                            (1H)
                    R  O
                           OH
                       (1H)





             5.6     5.2      4.25     4.15     4.05    3.95
                                   δ (ppm)
                              1
           Figure 6.13 Characteristic  H-NMR signals of 1- and 2-MG. (Used with per-
           mission from Chadha [42].)
   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202