Page 155 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future
P. 155

Life cycle sustainability assessment in the energy sector  141


                 In the case of wood pellets, direct emissions were estimated using the
                                   €
              GEMIS v4.71 database (Oko-Institut, 2012). These were integrated with
              the other background processes from the Ecoinvent v2.2 database
              (Ecoinvent Centre, 2010) using GaBi 4.4 life cycle assessment software
              (PE International, 2008). Emissions of heavy metals were calculated using
              data on the metal content of virgin wood and the proportions of each metal
              emitted to air, as reported by Krook et al. (2004).
                 In the case of miscanthus pellets, background data are also from Ecoin-
              vent v2.2 (Ecoinvent Centre, 2010), while miscanthus composition (includ-
              ing heavy metals) was taken from Obernberger et al. (2006) allowing direct
              combustion emissions to be calculated in GEMIS. Aerial emissions of heavy
              metals were calculated based on Krook et al. (2004) data on the proportion
              of metals emitted to air. All data were combined in GaBi 4.4
              (PE International, 2008). It should be noted that the elemental composition
              of miscanthus is greatly influenced by soil composition, time of harvest, and
              the amount of leaf matter harvested. Direct emissions are therefore likely to
              be less accurate than those from wood pellets.

              Waste disposal
              As in Ecoinvent, 50% of the wood ash from combustion is assumed to be
              disposed of in sanitary landfill, 25% in municipal incineration, and 25%
              via spreading on agricultural land.


              3.1.4 Indicators and impact assessment
              The sustainability indicators considered in this assessment are presented in
              Table 5.5. The quantification of these metrics follows the approaches dis-
              cussed in Section 2, with extra detail available in Stamford and Azapagic
              (2014).


              3.1.5 Interpretation
              The results of the case study are shown in… including data on comparator
              technologies which are taken from Stamford and Azapagic (2012). Due to
              the volume of results, each pillar of sustainability is assessed in turn.
                 The techno-economic indicators (Fig. 5.6) show biomass to compete
              well against the other technologies, benefitting from a potentially infinite
              fuel reserve (assuming appropriate management of the biomass resource),
              the best dispatchability of all options due to its relatively low capital cost,
              and levelized costs that are slightly higher than gas power but lower than
              all other options. However, readers should note that this assessment relies
   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160