Page 97 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future
P. 97

Indicators for sustainability assessment  87


                      Pyrolytic oil, synthesis gas, electricity and heat, for biorefinery using straw for
                    the production of second generation biofuels and methanol with oxygen gasification.
                 15.0                               500      (420–470)
               Total accumulated energy  (PJ/a)  11.0  (7–10)  (5–8)  Renewable and others  Emissions  (k tCO 2 -eq/year)  400  Methanol
                 13.0
                                                              442
                      8.6
                                   Biomass
                  9.0
                                                                    Products
                            6.5
                                                    300
                                   fossil
                  7.0
                                                                    Diesel
                                                                    Auxiliary materials
                  5.0
                                                    200
                                                                    Transport
                  3.0
                                                    100  (25–50)    Auxiliary energy
                                                                    Straw
                  1.0                                    34
                 –1.0                                -
              Fig. 4.8 Comparison between the energy balance and GHG emissions for a biorefinery
              and a reference case (Jungmeier et al., 2013).
              7Study case
              With the objective of evaluating the impact of biofuel, food, and electricity
              production technologies on the energy and sustainability indicators of a spe-
              cific biorefinery that uses sugarcane, six study cases will be considered. Each
              case utilizes different thermochemical or biochemical production routes,
              as follows:
              • Case zero (ZRO): Based on a configuration currently available in the Bra-
                zilian sugar and ethanol sector, and considers that all straw and bagasse are
                burnt in the steam cogeneration cycle boilers for the production of
                electricity.
              • Case base (BSE): Considers the incorporation of the thermochemical gas-
                ification route for the production of Fischer-Tropsch fuels and electricity
                from the BIG-GTCC cycle (Biomass Integrated Gasifier-Gas Turbine
                Combined Cycle). The biochemical route is employed for the production
                of lignocellulose ethanol and products of ABE fermentation. The amount
                of bagasse available is equally distributed to all biorefinery processes, and
                therefore each process receives a third of the available bagasse. Syngas pro-
                duced via gasification is equally distributed between Fischer-Tropsch
                synthesis and BIG-GTCC cycle.
              • Case E2G (lignocellulose ethanol): Considers the biochemical route for the
                utilization of all bagasse available at the plant, for the production of ligno-
                cellulose ethanol. The lignin generated in the process is used as fuel in the
                steam cogeneration boilers.
              • Case B2G (biobutanol): Considers the biochemical route for the produc-
                tion of biobutanol, using all the available bagasse in ABE fermentation.
                As in case E2G, the lignin produced is used as fuel in the steam cogene-
                ration boilers.
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102