Page 92 - Biomedical Engineering and Design Handbook Volume 2, Applications
P. 92

OVERVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVICES  71

              3.4 PACEMAKERS AND IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATORS

              3.4.1 Market Size
                          The market for pacemakers and other cardiac electrophysiologic (EP) devices has grown over the past
                          five decades due to improved device function, advances in technology and implantation techniques, and
                          a rapidly expanding set of clinical indications. Approximately 1 million patients in the United States had
                          permanent pacemakers in 1996 (Kusumoto and Goldschlager, 1996), many of whom will need either a
                          lead or generator replacement sometime in the future. Recent incidence data from the CDC suggest that
                          at least 167,000  permanent cardiac pacemakers were implanted in United States in 2005, with a
                          minimal estimate of 79,000 automatic implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) units being placed
                          during the same year (DeFrances et al., 2007). An additional 39,000 combination devices intended for
                          coordinated contraction of the ventricles, termed cardiac resynchronization, were also implanted in 2005
                          (DeFrances et al., 2007). This last group in particular is expected to have significant future growth.

              3.4.2 Indications

                          The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society consensus
                          practice guideline lists current indications for artificial pacemaker and implanted cardioverter-
                          defibrillator use (Epstein et al., 2008). In general, the purpose of a pacemaker is to deliver an elec-
                          trical impulse of sufficient magnitude to depolarize the heart chamber in a spreading, coordinated
                          fashion as occurs in a normal heartbeat. In contrast, defibrillators are used to depolarize the entire
                          heart at once in an effort to terminate uncoordinated contractions. The natural refractory period of
                          the myocardial tissue usually prevents erratic residual electrical activity from propagating for a short
                          period of time, restoring coordinated muscular contraction.
                            In general, a pacemaker is warranted in certain cases where electric impulse conduction or initia-
                          tion in the heart is blocked, slowed, or triggered in an irregular, variable fashion. Specific diseases for
                          which pacemaker therapy is employed include certain forms of atrioventricular and fascicular con-
                          duction block, sinus node dysfunction, and some forms of neurocardiogenic syncope (Gregoratos
                          et al., 1998). The most popular indications for first time implantation of cardiac pacemakers have
                          changed over time. In 1997, almost 50 percent of new pacemakers were placed to treat sinus node
                          dysfunction, the most common indication for pacemaker implantation in the United States (Bernstein
                          and Parsonnet, 2001). Congenital or acquired atrioventricular (AV) conduction block was second,
                          accounting for approximately 30 percent of primary implantations, followed by AV block secondary
                          to radiofrequency ablation, drug-induced bradycardia, neurocardiogenic causes, and tachyarrhythmia
                          (Bernstein and Parsonnet, 2001). Emerging indications, particularly pacemaker treatment of conges-
                          tive heart failure, could significantly alter the percentages indicated above (Cazeau et al., 2001; Gerber
                          et al., 2001). Worldwide results indicate fewer implantations for sinus node dysfunction when com-
                          pared to U.S. data, with a significant percentage implanted for atrial fibrillation (Mond et al., 2004).
                            The indications for implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator are based primarily on the past
                          presence of a potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmia due to nontransient causes, regardless of the
                          specific illness (Gregoratos et al., 1998).  Three indications, spontaneous ventricular tachycardia
                          (VT) or fibrillation (VF), aborted sudden death, and syncope with inducible VT or VF accounted for
                          around 95 percent of the devices implanted in the United States for which an indication was reported
                          (Bernstein and Parsonnet, 2001).

              3.4.3 Device Design
                          The wide range of electrophysiologic disorders treated with pacemakers and defibrillators require
                          devices with various capabilities and settings. Generic classification codes have been developed to ease
                          the identification of the different pacemakers, defibrillators, and associated leads presented both in
                          the literature and medical practice. One such code is the North American Society for Pacing and
                          Electrophysiology/British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group Generic Pacemaker Code, which
                          contains five positions and defines the chambers that are paced and sensed, the potential electrical
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97