Page 93 - Biomedical Engineering and Design Handbook Volume 2, Applications
P. 93

72  MEDICAL DEVICE DESIGN

                       TABLE 3.1  The Five-Position NASPE/BPEG Generic Pacemaker Code
                       Positions and   I. Chamber(s)  II. Chamber(s)   III. Pacemaker  IV. Rate  V. Multisite
                       description   paced       sensed      response     modulation   pacing
                                   Atrium       Atrium       Triggered  Rate Modulation  Atrium
                                   Ventricle    Ventricle    Inhibited  NOne           Ventricle
                                   Dual         Dual         Dual                      Dual
                                   NOne         NOne         NOne                      NOne
                         The purpose of the code is to allow medical practitioners to recognize the basic features and capabilities of a given pace-
                       maker. The code alone does not provide a complete description of device features, but is clear and simple to use.
                         Source: Adapted from Bernstein et al. (2002).



                       response to sensed rhythms, rate modulation functions, and whether multisite pacing is present (Bernstein
                       et al., 2002). Table 3.1 summarizes the possible features for each location. The code represents a simpli-
                       fication of previous generic classification schemes (Bernstein et al., 1987) with antitachyarrythmia func-
                       tions being represented with the analogous defibrillator classification code (Bernstein et al., 1993).
                       A similar classification code exists for pacing leads (Bernstein and Parsonnet, 1996a). More than 60 percent
                       of pacemakers implanted in 1997 were of the DDDR type, possessing dual chamber sensing and pacing
                       with both excitatory and inhibitory functions, with additional rate adaptive features (Bernstein and
                       Parsonnet, 2001). A similar trend toward dual chamber units was seen worldwide (Mond et al., 2004).
                         Pacemaker and defibrillator systems consist of two implanted and one external component: the
                       generator, cardiac leads, and programmer, respectively (Morley-Davies and Cobbe, 1997). Although
                       the clinical function of pacemakers and defibrillators differ, the desired component characteristics
                       are similar and include low complication rates coupled with small size, durability, and longevity.
                       Generators.  Despite enhanced functional performance and an ever-increasing array of features,
                       current ICD generators displace less than half the volume of those devices implanted a short time ago
                       due to improved circuit, packaging, and power storage technology (Morris et al., 1999). Similarly,
                       modern pacemaker generators are small, thin, and weigh only 20 to 30 g (Kusumoto and Goldschlager,
                       1996). Generator and battery technology allows pacemakers to last approximately 5 to 9 years in the
                       body (Morley-Davies and Cobbe, 1997), with the more complex dual chamber designs having shorter
                       lifespans than the simpler, single chamber units (Kusumoto and Goldschlager, 1996). An example of
                       a pacemaker and implantable defibrillator generator are shown in Fig. 3.8.
                         Power technology has steadily improved since the first mercury acid batteries of the 1960s, with
                       modifications in other generator components and usage algorithms further increasing battery
                       endurance (Jeffrey and Parsonnet, 1998). Novel power supplies have included the nuclear slug and
                       biokinetic sources, but the advent of the lithiurn-based power source allowed for increased genera-
                       tor longevity over mercury acid types and was amenable to being hermetically sealed (Jeffrey and
                       Parsonnet, 1998). The current batteries used in pacemakers and defibrillators differ in formulation.
                       Pacemakers utilize lithium-iodine batteries (Kusumoto and Goldschlager, 1996) while ICDs utilize
                       lithium-silver-vanadium batteries and a capacitor network for discharges (Morris et al., 1999).
                       Electrical Leads. The pacing lead consists of five components: the connector, conductor, insulating
                       material, electrode(s), and fixation mechanism. Electrical leads have to fulfill a number of conflicting
                       requirements, although reliable performance remains the dominant criteria (de Voogt, 1999). Leads should
                       possess a small diameter, be flexible enough to place but durable enough to resist wear, possess favorable
                       power consumption characteristics, anchor in place to prevent migration, and enjoy good biocompatibility.
                         Pacing leads can be subdivided into a number of groups based on the area of placement and method
                       of stimulation. Leads can be placed either on the epicardium (external surface) of the heart or, by a trans-
                       venous route, onto the endocardium (internal surface) of the right heart atrium or ventricle. Epicardial
                       leads are used for permanent pacing in pediatric cases, where size considerations or congenital defects
                       prevent transvenous placement, and in patients who have undergone tricuspid valve replacement (Mitrani
                       et al., 1999). Percutaneous transvenous placement of the lead is the preferred route in most patients.
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98