Page 128 - Biorefinery 2030 Future Prospects for the Bioeconomy (2015)
P. 128

96         4  Prospects for the Bazancourt-Pomacle Biorefinery Between Now and 2030


            challenges of the twenty-first century, and face huge market entry barriers. If we
            compare these prospects with previous periods (1970–2000), which with the benefit
            of hindsight appear much more favourable, cooperative values and the maxim “let’s
            do things by ourselves” become even more vital. Perhaps, however, “by ourselves”
            needs to be looked at again.




            5.2    The Basis of the Cooperative Model

            Will such a context threaten the basics of the cooperative model, such as “one man
            one vote,” the agreement to invest 1 year’s harvest, the commitment to deliver all or
            part of the harvest to the cooperative and mutualisation as a way to make economies
            of scale and to smooth over fluctuating market conditions?
              We can identify a number of challenges:

            – Will the cost/benefit ratio lose its relevance, for example due to the high
              volatility of agricultural raw materials prices? If prices increase too much
              (a threefold increase in the price of a tonne of wheat), the commitment to deliver
              will become questionable.
            – Will the development of cooperatives by increasing their size and internalising
              activities result in falling respect for their traditional values? Will farmers feel
              less comfortable as “capitalists” or as owners of an industrial holding group?
            – Will the increasing international dimension of cooperatives lead to
              corresponding damage to their links with their original territory and with the
              concerns and interests of their farmers?
            – Will the growing dependence on financial markets lead to a feeling of dispos-
              session, of loss of control, or even of risk by cooperative members?

              If necessary, cooperative board members and presidents could find themselves
            out of line with their management: extremely well educated, talented staff, often
            recruited from large groups, but who were not brought up “on the land.”
              In the face of attempts to facilitate the growth in size of cooperatives by dividing
            them into divisions for each type of activity, and particularly by creating holding
            companies covering industrial operations, the question remains of the survival of
            links between cooperatives and their members.
              As discussed above in Sect. 3, the farmers are more concerned with maintaining
            the income of their farm, reducing their debt, sustainable development, the possi-
            bility of passing the farm on to their children, than with the global success of the
            cooperative.
              Different forums (Quebec, International Summit of Cooperatives, 11  2012) and
            research work have recently investigated these questions, and certain future


            11
             Deroy and Thenot (2012).
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133