Page 92 - Biosystems Engineering
P. 92

Biosystems Analysis and Optimization      73

               Once the return ratio L(s) has been designed, the transfer function of
               the controller C(s) can be derived from this.

               2.5.4  Controller Design Example: Depth Control
                       for Slurry Injection
               The stability analysis and design principles that have been described in
               the previous sections will now be applied to the design of the depth
               control system for slurry injection for which the model has been identi-
               fied in Sec. 2.3.4. The estimated transfer function was expressed as V/V,
               but we would like to know the measured depth in centimeters, there-
               fore Eq. (2.79) is multiplied by a gain factor of 5 cm/V to get
                                            2
                          Gs () =  Ys ()  =  11 .7 s + 30 .9 s + 3315  (2.94)
                                                    2
                                             3
                                      4
                               Xs ()  s + 15 .1 s + 139s +  1560s
                                                  9
               The closed-loop gain L(s) for this system can now be designed through
               the stepwise procedure described in the previous section. This can be
               done quite easily using the SISO design toolbox in MATLAB (The
               Mathworks, Natick, Massachusetts). The design requirements are the
               following:
                    1.  The maximal actuator speed is determined by the maximal oil
                      flow that can be generated through the proportional hydraulic
                      valve and sent to the hydraulic actuators. The actuator rate
                      limit a  for this system was found to be 5 cm/s. If we consider
                           rl
                      an input step size of 1 cm, the magnitude crossover frequency
                      ω  can be calculated using Eq. (2.93) to be 5 rad/s.
                       co
                    2.  The desired disturbance attenuation rate at 0.5 rad/s is a fac-
                      tor of 10, which means that the desired magnitude of the
                      closed-loop gain is 20 log (10) = 20 dB.
                                           10
                    3.  An integrator action is desired to avoid steady-state error.
                   4.  High-frequency noise and unmodeled dynamics should be
                      sufficiently filtered.
                    5.  The phase margin should be at least 45° at crossover and the
                      gain margin at least 10 dB.
               Because of the integrator action, which is desired to avoid steady-state
               error, the bode plot decreases with 20 dB per decade. This makes that
               the disturbance attenuation requirement of 20 dB at 0.5 rad/s cannot
               be met without introducing a low-frequency zero when the crossover
               frequency is restricted to the actuator rate limit of 5 rad/s. Therefore,
               a single zero with a natural frequency of 0.1 rad/s is introduced to
               keep the midfrequency gain of the closed-loop gain more than 20 dB
               in the region around 0.5 rad/s. Introducing this zero causes the cross-
               over frequency to move to a higher frequency, which violates design
               requirement (1). Because lowering the gain is not an option, where
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97