Page 185 - Bridge and Highway Structure Rehabilitation and Repair
P. 185

160            SECTION 2                                        STRENGTHENING AND REPAIR WORK



                        behavior of steel and concrete structures. An approximate upper bound linear analysis can fi rst
                        be carried out and then compared to results from nonlinear analysis to estimate the degree of
                        nonlinearity and its effects. An example of nonlinear material behavior is shown by the C. S.
                        Whitney stress-strain curve for reinforced concrete sections.
                            At higher loads as cracking develops, most materials exhibit a nonlinear behavior. Stiffness
                        properties of concrete and composite members are based on uncracked sections or on cracked
                        sections consistent with anticipated behavior. Progressive cracking based on experimental ob-
                        servations is included in the mathematical model.
                            A load deflection behavior is usually more accurately defined than stress-strain behavior


                        since in the latter case physical changes such as crack formations would occur.

                            Principle of superposition: Large deflection analysis is inherently nonlinear, and loads are

                        not proportional to displacements. Superposition of deflections and stresses cannot be used.

                        From an analytical point of view, deflections, moments, and forces from dead load analysis can-
                        not be directly added to those from large deflection live load analysis. In other words, live load

                        analysis results cannot be “superposed” on dead load analysis results, and a unique solution will
                        be required for the combined dead and live loads acting together.
                        4.10.2 Simplifi ed Nonlinear Analysis
                            P-Delta method: Under concentric compressive axial forces, a slender column is subjected
                        to out-of-plane deflection “Delta” giving rise to additional moment of P-Delta. Additional mo-

                        ment causes an equivalent eccentricity of axial load.
                            Synergism may be defined as the interaction of moments and forces that when combined

                        produces a total effect which is greater than the sum of individual moment or force. Hence, syn-
                        ergistic effect of interaction results in apparent softening of the column, which can be expressed
                        as a loss of stiffness. Quantitatively this can be classified as a second order effect. When axial

                        compressive stress is high and reaches Euler bucking stress, failure by buckling takes place.
                            Approximate method can be used by selecting a moment correction factor. LRFD load factors
                        are used for analysis rather than applying the load factors after analysis is complete. Changes in

                        lateral deflection for each incremental load are incorporated in equilibrium equations. Iterative

                        adjustment of deflections is carried out until convergence is reached.

                            Moment magnification of long columns (AASHTO 4.5.3.2.2b):
                                                     M  3   M  4   M   2s                         (4.21)
                                                               2b
                                                       c
                                                            b
                                                                    s
                            where M  3 Moment on compression member, due to factored gravity loads (K-ft)
                                   2b
                                  M  3  Moment on compression member, due to factored gravity or lateral loads
                                   2s
                                       that result in side sway 9 l /1500
                                                              u
                                                       f  3   f  4   f                            (4.22)
                                                        c
                                                            b  2b
                                                                   s  2s
                            where f  3 Stress corresponding to M (ksi), f  3 Stress corresponding to M (ksi)
                                  2b                        2b     2s                        2s
                                                        3 C /(1 6 X ) 9 1                         (4.23)
                                                           m
                                                                   1
                                                      b
                            where X  3  P /()  P  ) where P  3 Factored axial load (Kips), )  3
                                   1   u   k  e       u                           k
                                      Stiffness reduction factor (1 for steel and 0.75 for concrete)
                                                                      2
                                               Euler buckling load P  3 ! EI/(K l ) 2             (4.24)
                                                                 e          u
                            where K 3 Effective length factor,
                                   l  3 Unsupported length of compression member
                                   u
                                     3 1/(1 6 X );
                                    s
                                              2
                            where X   3 $P /() $P )
                                   2     u   k   e
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190