Page 148 - Business Plans that Work A Guide for Small Business
P. 148

Financial Plan: Telling Your Story in Numbers   •   139

                 first is ServiceMaster. It is a larger franchisor that is the umbrella organi-
                 zation for such service brands as Merry Maids and Terminex. Since they
                 are in the space of providing services, including housecleaning, to the end
                 user, it seems to be a good match. We also looked at Yum Brands, the
                 franchisor of such name brand fast food restaurants as KFC, Taco Bell,
                 and Pizza Hut, among others. Exhibit 10.1 shows Lazybones, Service-
                 Master, and Yum Brands side by side. We can see that the Lazybones gross
                 margin is 37 percent and 51 percent higher than ServiceMaster and Yum
                 Brands,  respectively.  ServiceMaster,  like  Lazybones,  provides  services
                 to its end customers through a combination of company-owned stores
                 and franchisees. Its costs of goods sold (COGS) may be higher because
                 the services are often provided at the customer’s location. Lawn services
                 have to happen at the customer’s lawn. Pest control has to happen at the
                 customer’s place of residence or business. Thus they may need consider-
                 ably more people to conduct the services. Considering that Yum Brands
                 operates a number of restaurants, their COGS includes food and direct
                 labor, whereas Lazybones only has direct labor and minimal expenses
                 for detergent and other cleaning products. Thus the higher gross margin
                 may make sense, but the magnitude would cause us to take a closer look
                 to make sure that we aren’t neglecting some major cost items.
                     The large difference in gross margins translates to larger earnings before
                 interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) margins, even
                 though Lazybones is expecting to spend more on sales, general, and admin-
                 istrative (SG&A) costs. One last area of analysis might be sales per employee.
                 We counted 14 corporate employees per Lazybones headcount chart, and
                 we  assumed  four  full-time  equivalents  for  each  of  the  eight  company-
                  owned stores. In this situation, Lazybones falls between the two compara-
                 ble companies in sales per employee. This suggests that Lazybones is likely
                 in the right range for the number of employees they are projecting.
                     Remember, gross variance, positive or negative, from the comparable
                 companies will draw investor attention and should draw your attention.
                 If you understand these discrepancies, you can address investor concerns
                 with confidence, increasing your credibility. If we were potential inves-
                 tors in Lazybones, we would want Dan to clearly articulate how he can
                 manage such impressive margins. While we understand that his company-
                 owned stores are likely to perform similarly to the existing units in Mad-
                 ison  and  Syracuse,  we  wonder  if  he  has  accurately  captured  the  costs
                 and margins of being a franchisor. We would expect that the franchised
                 units might dampen margins while the company is putting franchisor
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153