Page 401 - Cam Design Handbook
P. 401

THB12  9/19/03  7:34 PM  Page 389

                                CAM SYSTEM DYNAMICS—ANALYSIS               389


                                   tX
                                t =
                                    T 1
                                    s       sT ˙
                                G  =    G ˙  =  1
                                    h       h
                                    x       xT ˙     xT ˙˙  2
                                                  ˙˙
                                X  =    X ˙  =  1  X  =  1  ,
                                    h       h         h
                                    2 p  m
                                T  =
                                    T 1  k c
                                    cT
                                x =
                                    4 p
                                    k  Ê h  ˆ  2
                                F  =  c  Á  ˜  b =  wT ,
                                                    1
                                    k t  Ë R m b ¯
            where h is the cam lift in a dwell-rise-dwell motion input and T 1 is the period of such
            input. Substituting these into Eq. (12.26) yields
                   2 ˙
              ( 1+ G FX  2 1+ G Fx  2 ˙  ) Ê  2p  ˆ ˙  +  Ê  2p  ˆ  2  X  = (  2 ˙  ) Ê  2p  ˆ ˙ G  +  Ê 2p  ˆ  2  . G  (12.27)
                     ˙˙
                    ) + (
                                                21+ G Fx
                                     X
                                 Ë  T  ¯  Ë  T  ¯        Ë  T  ¯  Ë  T  ¯
            This is a second-order linear differential equation with variable coefficients.
               Figure 12.23 shows the acceleration response of a cycloidal cam with T = 0.15 when
            damping is not taken into account. Note that when F = 0 (corresponding to an infinitely
            rigid shaft), the curve resembles that of nominal acceleration. With F increasing, the ampli-
            tudes  of  the  residual  vibration  increase  markedly.  The  reason  for  this  phenomenon  is
            that at big values of F, i.e., with a relatively flexible shaft, a large amount of energy is
            stored in windup and bending during the first half of the cam lift. During the second half,
            with  the  decreasing  slope  of  the  cam,  the  shaft  relaxes  and  acts  as  a  catapult. At  the
            increased angular velocity of the cam, the deceleration of the follower may appreciably
            exceed the nominal value, so that heavy vibrations will persist after the end of the cam
            rise. Figure 12.24 shows a plot of the residual amplitude of acceleration versus T, with F
            as a varying parameter for an undamped cycloidal cam. Damping would change the effect
            very little.


            12.4.5 Multi-Degree-of-Freedom System

            A complex dynamic model with eleven degrees of freedom was studied by Kim and New-
            combe (1981). For more on multi-degree-of-freedom systems, see Pisano and Freuden-
            stein  (1983).  Kim  and  Newcombe  (1981)  also  presented  a  study  to  take  into  account
            the random nature of flexibility and fabrication errors. Figure 12.25 shows the schematic
            model consisting of driving torsional and driven translational subsystems. Figure 12.26
            shows  the  three-degree-of-freedom  torsional  subsystem  model.  Figure  12.27  displays
            the eight-degree-of-freedom translational subsystem model. The latter is divided into two
            subsystems according to the vertical motion (y axis) and the horizontal motion (x axis) of
            the parts.
               Using  Newton’s  second  law,  we  can  write  the  following  sets  of  equations  of
            motion.
               For  translational  movement  of  the  follower  (see  Fig.  12.27)  along  the  y  axis
            direction
   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406