Page 48 - Carbon Nanotube Fibres and Yarns
P. 48

Carbon nanotube fibers spun directly from furnace   41



















              Fig.  3.2  Poisoning-reactivation model explaining the growth of MWNT.  (Reproduced
              with permission from Gspann T, Smail F, Windle A. Spinning of carbon nanotube fibres using
              the floating catalyst high temperature route: purity issues and the critical role of sulphur.
              Faraday Discuss. 173 (2014) 2–7.)


                identified by Raman spectra of split G peak, RBM signal, two- dimensional
              (2D) peak downshift and higher I G /I D  ratio (from 5 to 200). Gspann et al.
              [11] suggested that sulfur could make the catalyst particle less “sticky,” which
              limits the catalyst size by lowering the particle collision rate and also pre-
              vents the iron deposited on the reactor wall in the high-temperature reac-
              tion zone. Another analysis [21, 33] suggests a poisoning-reactivation model
              which explains the formation of MWNT with higher sulfur concentration
              (Fig. 3.2). At lower sulfur concentration, the partial sulfur coating enhances
              the catalyst activity and prevents the particle coarsening. However, an ex-
              cess amount of sulfur will initially make the iron particle inactive for CNT
              growth, which grows larger due to collision. When these larger catalyst
              particles enter the high-temperature growth zone, the sulfur gets partially
              removed possibly by forming H 2 S with hydrogen. This reactivates the larger
              catalyst particles and promotes growth of MWNTs. Based on this analysis,
              two possible routes can be used to promote SWNT synthesis. The first is to
              lower the amount of sulfur, which produces small active particles nucleating
              SWNTs. The other method is to introduce carbon atoms in the earlier stage
              where catalyst particles are still small; this could promote CNT nucleation
              which prevents further growth of the iron particles.
                 The timing of sulfur availability is also essential. Earlier arrival of sulfur
              could produce more active catalysts by limiting the carbon solubility in
              the catalyst, which prevents the encapsulating graphene layer and pro-
              motes the carbon reconstruction and edge growth [8]. This was used to
              explain the low percentage of active iron particles due to the lower chance
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53