Page 77 - Chemical process engineering design and economics
P. 77

62                                                       Chapter 2


           Correcting Equipment Cost for Inflation

           Because the  cost  literature reports equipment costs  for some  time  in the past,  we
           must  correct the  costs  for inflation.  We  can calculate  the present value  of  cost  of
           equipment, C 2, using an inflation index, I, as given by Equation 2.9.

                   la
              = C li ——                                                  (2.9)
            C a
                   In
                There  are  several  inflation  or  cost  indexes  in  use.  Examples  are  the
            Chemical  Engineering  Cost  Index  (CE  Index),  and  the  Nelson  Refinery  Cost
            Index.  Chemical  Engineering  magazine  publishes  the  CE  Index  regularly,
           whereas the  Oil and  Gas Journal  reports the Nelson Refinery  Index. We will use
           the  CE  Index.  Cost  indexes  are  relative  to  some  time  in  the  past.  Chemical
           Engineering  magazine  defined  the  CE  Index  as  equal  to  100  during  1957-1959
           when plant costs were relatively stable.
                Chemical Engineering magazine established their index in  1963,  and revised
            it  in  1982.  To  revise  their  index  they  surveyed  the  process  industry,  equipment
           manufacturers,  contractors,  and  consultants,  as  described  by  Chilton  and Arnold
            [17].  The  magazine determined the  fractional  contribution to the  CE index of the
           many components of the  average chemical plant. Determining the fractional  con-
            tribution is necessary because the components inflate  at different  rates. The  types
            of plant studied were fluid,  fluid-solid,  and solids-processing plants, built as a new
           plant at a new site, a new plant at an existing site, and an expansion of an existing
           plant. Chilton and Arnold  [17]  discussed other details of the CE index. The major
            changes in the revised index were a reduction in the number of components  com-
           prising the index from  110 to 66, the replacement of many components with more
            suitable ones, and the lowering of the construction productivity factor  from  2.50  to
            1.75.  Figure 2.6  shows the  fractional  contribution of the many components to the
            revised index. BLS in the  first  column in Figure 2.6  is an abbreviation for the Bu-
            reau of Labor Statistics.
                Table  2.12  gives  the  CE  Indexes  since  1969.  As  shown  in  Figure  2.6  and
            Table  2.12,  the CE Index is composed of four major parts -  Equipment, Construc-
            tion  Labor,  Buildings,  and  Engineering  and  Supervision.  The  equipment  compo-
            nent,  in turn,  is  subdivided into several components.  Table  2.12  lists cost indexes
            for  all  major  components  of  the  CE  Index.  If  we  sum  up  the  fractional  contribu-
            tion, given in Figure  2.6,  of each component of the cost index, we obtain the plant
            cost index. Example 2.2 illustrates the calculation of the plant cost index from the
            component cost indexes. The  cost indexes in Table  2.12  for a given year are time
            averaged for the year, and thus they are more representative of mid-year values as
            illustrated in Example 2.3.






         Copyright © 2003 by Taylor & Francis Group LLC
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82