Page 80 - Communication and the Evolution of Society
P. 80

57                         What  Is  Universal  Pragmatics?

         fulness).  But  this  proves  to  be  unnecessary  if  in  a  given  speech
         action  we  distinguish  among
           a.  The  implicitly  presupposed  conditions  of  generalized  context,
           b.  The  specific  meaning  of  an  interpersonal  relation  to  be  estab-
         lished,  and
           c.  The  implicitly  raised,  general  validity  claim.
         Whereas  (a)  and  (b)  fix  the  distinct  classes  (different  in  differ-
         ent  languages)  of  standardized  speech  actions,  (c)  determines
         the  universal  modes  of  communication,  modes  inherent  in  speech
         in  general.
           Before  going  into  (a)  and  (b),  I  would  like  at  least  to  remark
         that  the  Austinian  starting  point  in  the  distinction  between  per-
         formative  and  constative  utterances  provides  an  overly  narrow
         view;  the  validity  spectrum  of  speech  is  not  exhausted  by  the  two
         modes  of  communication  I  developed  from  this  distinction.  Nat-
         urally  there  can  be  no  mode  of  communication  in  which  the
         intelligibility  of  an  utterance  is  thematically  stressed;  for  every
         speech  act  must  fulfill  the  presupposition  of  comprehensibility
         in  the  same  way.  If in  some  communication  there is  a  breakdown
         of  intelligibility,  the  requirement  of  comprehensibility  can  be  made
         thematic  only  through  passing  over  to  a  hermeneutic  discourse,
         and  then  in  connection  with  the  relevant  linguistic  system.  The
         truthfulness  with  which  a  speaker  utters  his  intentions  can,  how-
         ever,  be  stressed  at  the  level  of  communicative  action  in  the  same
         way  as  the  truth  of  a  proposition  and  the  rightness  (or  appropri-
         ateness)  of  an  interpersonal  relation.  Truthfulness  guarantees
         the  transparency  of  a  subjectivity  representing  itself  in  language.
         It  is  especially  emphasized  in  the  expressive  use  of  language.  The
         paradigms  are  first-person  sentences  in  which  the  speaker’s  wishes,
         feelings,  intentions,  etc.  (which  are  expressed  incidentally  in
         every  speech  act)  become  disclosed,  that  is,  sentences  such  as:
                3)  “I  long  for  you.”

                4)  “I  wish  that...”
         It  is  unusual  for  such  sentences  to  be  explicitly  embedded  in  an
         illocutionary  act  as  follows:
                3’)  “I  hereby  express  to  you  that  I  long  for  you.”
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85