Page 82 - Communication and the Evolution of Society
P. 82

59                         What  Is  Universal  Pragmatics?

         quence  of  speech  actions  can  be  unequivocally  classified  under
         these  viewpoints.  I  am  claiming  only  that  every  competent  speaker
         has  in  principle  the  possibility  of  unequivocally  selecting  one
         mode  because  with  every  speech  act  he  must  raise  three  universal
         validity  claims,  so  that  he  can  single  out  one  of  them  to  thematize
                               )
         a  component  of  speech.

         The  Rational  Foundation  of  Illocutionary  Force
         Having  somewhat  elucidated  the  meaning  structure  and  validity
         basis  of  basic  types  of  speech  acts,  I  would  like  to  return  to  the
         question,  in  what  does  the  illocutionary  force  of  an  utterance
         consist?  To  begin,  we  know  only  what  it  results  in  if  the  speech
         action  succeeds—in  bringing  about  an  interpersonal  relation.
         Austin  and  Searle  have  analyzed  illocutionary  force  by  looking
         for  conditions  of  success  or  failure  of  speech  acts.  An  uttered
         content  receives  a  specific  communicative  function  through  the
         fact  that  the  standard  conditions  for  the  occurrence  of  a  corre-
         sponding  interpersonal  relation  are  fulfilled.  With  the  illocu-
         tionary  act,  the  speaker  makes  an  offer  that  can  be  accepted  or
         rejected.  The  attempt  a  speaker  makes  with  a  illocutionary  act
         may  founder  for  contingent  reasons  on  the  refusal  of  the  addressee
         to  enter  into  the  proffered  relationship.  This  case  is  of  no  interest
         in  the  present  context.  We  shall  be  concerned  with  the  other  case,
         in  which  the  speaker  himself  is  responsible  for  the  failure  of  the
         speech  act  because  the  utterance  is  unacceptable.  When  the  speaker
         makes  an  utterance  that  manifestly  contains  no  serious  offer,  he
         cannot  count  on  the  occurrence  of  the  relationship  intended  by
         him.
           I  shall  speak  of  the  success  of  a  speech  act  only  when  the  hearer
         not  only  understands  the  meaning  of  the  sentence  uttered  but
         also  actually  enters  into  the  relationship  intended  by  the  speaker.
         And  I  shall  analyze  the  conditions  for  the  success  of  speech  acts
         in  terms  of  their  “‘acceptability.’”  Since  I  have  restricted  my  ex-
         amination  from  the  outset  to  communicative  action—that  is,
         action  oriented  to  reaching  understanding—a  speech  act  counts
         as  acceptable  only  if  the  speaker  not  merely  feigns  but  sincerely
         makes  a  serious  offer.  A  serious  offer  demands  a  certain  engage-
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87