Page 34 - Communication in Organizations Basic Skills and Conversation Models
P. 34

Sender skills     23


        criticism is justified, then  this  fear  is  ungrounded.  Second, if the other person does
        become angry, annoying as this might be, this anger is entirely his own responsibility.
        Above all, you know how you can  react  to this anger (see pp. 17–18). An example
        follows:

              Bert Berman has plucked up the courage and one day he asks his assistant
              Dan Diamond if he can come to his office at the end of the afternoon. At
              the arranged time Diamond steps in.

        BERT: Take a seat, Danny. I just want to speak with you about something. Frankly, I find
           it troublesome that for the last three weeks you have   called in sick on Monday
           mornings. What is actually wrong at that time?


                                   Situation clarification
        By situation clarification we mean: the skill of  perceiving  emerging  problems  or
        misunderstandings in time, realizing their importance and discussing them. This skill is
        important in many situations, namely at moments when mutual  expectations  are  no
        longer in tune with each other. The goal of the skill is to bring about or restore the clarity
        of the conversation. This  skill  is  somewhat more complex than those previously
        discussed. When applying it, there is a conversation about the conversation. This is also
        called  meta-communication or  meta-conversation. With meta-communication you take
        some  distance  from the conversation that you are holding at that moment (Kouwer,
        1973). Figure 3.1 shows the two conversation levels.
           To clarify further we give a few concrete situations where the application of this skill
        is useful. First, a situation where someone is addressed about responsibilities that he does
        not have:

              Grace Green and Ronald Rosenthal are having a conversation about the
              staff’s day out.

        GRACE: So we agree that we need to hold a survey amongst all staff members.
           Depending on the outcome, we must then make sure we get a better programme for
           the day. After all we must ensure that the atmosphere at work improves.
        RONALD: Wait a second, let me just clear up a few things. I will be glad to help think
           about the staff’s day out, and also to join in helping with the organization, but I most
           decidedly do not feel responsible for the atmosphere. We need to create the conditions
           where it is possible for others to make the atmosphere, I think.
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39