Page 135 - Communication Commerce and Power The Political Economy of America and the Direct Broadcast Satellite
P. 135

124          Communication,  Commerce and Power

           resist both foreign and domestic competition. One of the more unsa-
           vory examples of this resistance during the 1980s was the role played
           by  US  cable  television  companies  in  monopolizing  local  markets,
           dominating national programing activities, and subsequently conspir-
           ing to block competitive DBS developments.
             Modifications to state structures usually follow a complex of exter-
           nal political-economic pressures and domestic realignments. How this
           process has  taken place in  US foreign  communication policy consti-
           tutes the undercurrent issue flowing through the next two chapters. As
           indicated thus far,  as  a  result of mostly economic and technological
           developments,  US  foreign  communication policy was brought to the
           political-economic fore in the  1980s.  Established distinctions between
           domestic  and  international  information-based  commodity  activities
           became  increasingly  blurred  as  the  activities  of a  broad  range  of
           American corporations were  being globalized and/or becoming more
           and  more  dependent  on  international  communications.  Intra-state
           jurisdictions became obscured while new state agencies directly parti-
           cipated in communication  policy making.  To  sort out these  shifting
           state  mechanisms,  Chapter  6  focuses  on  mostly  domestic  develop-
           ments,  while  Chapter 7 will  tend  more  to  analyze  the  international
           forces at work. Again, DBS constitutes a focal point for much of what
           follows.




           NOTES
           I   Dante R.  Fascell, 'Modern Communications and Foreign Policy,' p.  3R.
           2   Hearings on 'Satellite Broadcasting: Implications for Foreign Policy,' p. 3R.
           3   See,  for  instance,  Hearings  on 'The  Role  and  Control  of International
               Communications and Information.'
           4   Joel H.  Woldman,  'The View Ahead:  Direct Satellite  Broadcasting and
               International  Communications.'  Report  to  the  United  States  Senate.
               Committee on Foreign Relations.  Reprinted in  United States Congress.
               Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. Subcommittee on International
               Operations.  Hearings  on  'The Role  and  Control  of International com-
               munications and Information,' 95th Cong., 1st sess., June 1977, p. 46.
           5   Ibid.,  p.  48.
           6   Gardner quoted in Hearings on 'Satellite Broadcasting: Implications for
               Foreign Policy,' pp. 64-5.
           7   Michael J. Stoil, 'The Executive Branch and International Telecommunica-
               tions Policy: The Case ofWARC "79",' in John J. Havick (ed.), Commu-
               nications  Policy and the  Political Process (Westport,  Conn.: Greenwood
               Press, 1983) p. 90.
   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140