Page 67 - Complementarity and Variational Inequalities in Electronics
P. 67

58  Complementarity and Variational Inequalities in Electronics


                           where a 0 ,a 1 ,...,a n ∈ R, a 0 > 0. We denote by 
(M) the Routh–Hurwitz ma-
                           trix associated with p, which is defined by


                                                          if  0 ≤ 2i − j ≤ n,
                                                    a 2i−j
                                         
(p) ij =                                    (4.5)
                                                      0   if  otherwise.
                           For example, if n = 5, then

                                                  ⎛                    ⎞
                                                     a 1  a 0  0  0  0
                                                  ⎜                    ⎟
                                                  ⎜ a 3  a 2  a 1  a 0  0 ⎟
                                                  ⎜                    ⎟
                                           
(p) = ⎜ a 5  a 4  a 3  a 2  a 1 ⎟.
                                                  ⎝ 0    0  a 5  a 4  a 3  ⎟
                                                  ⎜
                                                                       ⎠
                                                     0   0   0   0  a 5
                           The following result gives a criterion that can be used to determine whether all
                           the roots of the polynomial p have negative real parts (see e.g. [54]).

                           Theorem 1 (Routh–Hurwitz criterion). All the roots of the equation

                                                       p(λ) = 0

                           have real negative parts if and only if the leading principal minors of the Routh–
                           Hurwitz matrix 
(p) are positive.

                           Corollary 1. We have

                            i − (M) = n ⇔   1 (
(p M )) > 0,  12 (
(p M )) > 0,...,  12...n (
(p M )) > 0,

                           where

                                           (∀λ ∈ C) : p M (λ) = det(λI − M).

                              It is clear that i + (M) = n if and only if i − (−M) = n, and we get the follow-
                           ing result.

                           Corollary 2. We have


                            i + (M) = n ⇔   1 (
(q M )) > 0,  12 (
(q M )) > 0,...,  12...n (
(q M )) > 0

                           where
                                           (∀λ ∈ C) : q M (λ) = det(λI + M).
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72