Page 214 - Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers
P. 214

202                           6.  Inviscid  Flow  Equations  for  Incompressible  Flows



                                       +  10°  Flap

























         Fig.  6.13.  Effect  of  flap  deflection  on  the  lift  coefficient  of  a  NACA  0012  airfoil.


            The  modifications  to the  computer  program  of  Section  6.5  are  relatively  mi-
         nor  as indicated  in the  revised  program  given  in Appendix  B,  where  subroutine
         GAUSS   remains  unchanged.
            To demonstrate  the  application  of the  multielement  airfoil  program,  we  con-
         sider  a  simple  trailing-edge  flap  which  is  a  portion  of  the  trailing-edge  section
         of  an  airfoil  that  is  hinged  and  which  can  be  deflected  upward  and  downward.
         We assume  that  the  airfoil  section  is again  the  NACA  0012  airfoil  and  compute
         its  lift  coefficients  for  flap  deflection  angles  of  ±10°.
            Figure  6.13  shows  the  calculated  lift  curves  as  a  function  of  angle  of  attack
         for  different  flap  deflections.  Results  show  that  flap  deflection  has  no  effect  on
         the  calculated  lift  curve  slope  and  the  curves  are  simply  shifted  up  or  down
         depending  on  the  direction  of  the  flap  deflection.  Results  also  show  that  the
         zero  lift  angle  is shifted  away  from  a  =  0 with  flap  deflection.  Thus,  the  airfoil
         experiences  a  lifting  force  although  the  nominal  angle  of attack  remains  at  zero.
         Flap  deflection  can  be  viewed  as  effectively  changing  the  mean  line,  or  the
         camber  of the  airfoil.


         Appendix    6A   Finite  Difference   Program
         for  a  Circular  Cylinder

         The  finite  difference  program  for  the  circular  cylinder  (Appendix  B)  consists
         of  MAIN  and  two  subroutines  GAUSS  and  POISSON  discussed  in  subsection
         4.5.1  and  given  by  Tables  4.2  and  4.3,  respectively.  While  subroutine  GAUSS
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219