Page 184 - Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd edition
P. 184

ContCultural Theory Text Pages  4/4/03  1:42 PM  Page 175





                                      Postmodernism and cultural theory



                     CELEBRATING POSTMODERNISM: LYOTARD AND BAUDRILLARD

                     As a major academic event, postmodernism dates from the late
                     1970s, from the first publication of Lyotard’s La Condition post-
                     moderne, prepared originally for the Conseil des Universités of the
                     Government of Quebec (Lyotard, 1984). The concept was by no
                     means an original coinage, however. To the contrary, Lyotard’s
                     argument had been quite deliberately inserted into an already
                     existing North American discourse. As he explained: ‘the word
                     postmodern . . . is in current use on the  American continent
                     among sociologists and critics’ (p. xxiii). The most important of
                     Lyotard’s  American sources was Daniel Bell, then Professor
                     of Sociology at Harvard University, whose The Coming of Post-
                     Industrial Society (Bell, 1973) figured in the very first footnote. Bell
                     had argued that modernism represented a radically ‘adversary
                     culture’, opposed not merely to this particular society but to any
                     and all conceivable societies. According to Bell, the development
                     of the capitalist economic system had rendered its older Puritan
                     values obsolete, thereby unleashing an increasingly unrestrained
                     modernism, the simultaneous product of Hobbesian individual-
                     ism and corporate economics (Bell, 1976, pp. 80–1, 84). The
                     ‘postmodernism’ of the 1960s—and this was the term he used—
                     had finally subverted all restraints: ‘It is a programme to erase
                     all boundaries, to obliterate any distinction between the self and
                     the external world, between man and woman, subject and object,
                     mind and body’ (Bell, 1977, p. 243). ‘In doctrine and cultural life-
                     style’, he concluded, ‘the anti-bourgeois has won . . . The difficulty
                     in the West...is that bourgeois society—which in its emphasis
                     on individuality and the self gave rise to modernism—is itself
                     culturally exhausted’ (pp. 250–2).



                     Periodising postmodernism: Lyotard and Baudrillard
                     Bell’s argument was in essence a translation into North American
                     idiom of the cultural pessimism of German Kulturkritik. Trans-
                     lated back into French, the debate soon acquired a more
                     optimistic tenor. For where Bell had found licence, Lyotard would
                     soon cry liberty, both meaning in effect transgression, in the sense

                                                 175
   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189