Page 349 - Control Theory in Biomedical Engineering
P. 349

Continuum NasoXplorer manipulator with shape memory actuators  315


              of their homes, at ease. While the device is slim and can be handled via one-
              handed operation, there are still some features that we would like to improve
              to ensure it is optimized for personal and home use. The NasoXplorer con-
              sists of features that allow patients to undergo smooth and easy self-
              administered endoscopy. These include the use of soft materials, the sizeable
              bending angle of the device, and external controls to increase patient com-
              fort and enhance confidence in using the NasoXplorer. Future add-ons
              include the optimization of the Arduino code and the provision of a box
              for the control system. The inclusion of automation will reduce the time
              required for a full endoscopy procedure. Since the NasoXplorer is to be
              self-administered, training and demonstrations will be carried out to educate
              the patient on proper usage of the device. Usage of a home-based kit for
              nasopharyngoscopy is a more convenient, less time-consuming, and cheaper
              alternative for patients who require consistent nasopharyngoscopy in clinics
              and hospitals.



              Appendix: Supplementary material

              Supplementary material related to this chapter can be found on the accom-
              panying CD or online at https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821350-6.
              00011-1.


              References

              Albery, L., 1995. The efficacy of speech and language therapy for cleft palate speech disorders.
                 Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 30 (S1), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-
                 6984.1995.tb01678.x.
              Atar, M., 2014. Transnasal endoscopy: technical considerations, advantages, and limitations.
                 World J. Gastrointest. Endosc. 6 (2), 41. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i2.41.
              De Arau ´jo, L.L., Da Silva, A.S.C., Arau ´jo, B.M.A.M., Yamashita, R.P., Trindade, I.E.K.,
                 Fukushiro, A.P., 2016. Nasopharyngeal dimensions in normal individuals: normative
                 data. CoDAS 28 (4), 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015020.
              Gaviola, G.C., Chen, V., Chia, S.H., 2013. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study
                 comparing the efficacy of topical anesthetics in nasal endoscopy. Laryngoscope 123 (4),
                 852–858.
              Huang, Z.-L., Wang, D.-Y., Zhang, P.-C., 2001. Evaluation of nasal cavity by acoustic rhi-
                 nometry in Chinese, Malay and Indian ethnic groups. Acta Otolaryngol. 121 (7),
                 844–848.
              Kalairaj, M.S., Banerjee, H., Lim, C.M., Chen, P.Y., Ren, H., 2019. Hydrogel-matrix
                 encapsulated nitinol actuation with self-cooling mechanism. RSC Adv. 9 (59),
                 34244–34255.
              Morgan, N.J., MacGregor, F.B., Birchall, M.A., Lund, V.J., Sittampalam, Y., 1995. Racial
                 differences in nasal fossa dimensions by acoustic rhinometry. Rhinology 33, 224–228.
   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354