Page 291 - Corrosion Engineering Principles and Practice
P. 291

264   C h a p t e r   8                                 C o r r o s i o n   b y   W a t e r    265


                      A  pipeline  must  first  be  selected  for  analysis  before  any  additional
                      work can be done on it.
                         A second important point is that the maintenance and inspection
                      strategy should differ between distribution and transmission systems
                      to  reflect  the  much  higher  failure  consequences  for  transmission
                      pipelines compared to those of a typical distribution line. Approaches
                      that may not be economically viable for a distribution system could
                      be  employed  advantageously  in  a  transmission  system  to  prevent
                      failures. Essentially, the low consequences associated with a single
                      distribution  failure  also  mean  that  the  emphasis  in  distribution
                      systems  should  be  on  failure  management  in  order  to  minimize
                      life-cycle costs while a more proactive failure prevention approach
                      would  be  better  suited  for  transmission  systems  due  to  the  high
                      consequences of associated failures [6].

                      8.2.3  Condition Assessment Techniques
                      The pipes in water distribution and transmission systems are difficult
                      to inspect for damage due to their location below the surface of the
                      ground. This difficulty has led water utilities to rely on techniques
                      such  as  breakage  records,  leak  detection,  and  water  audits  to
                      determine the health of their systems. While these techniques have
                      been shown to be very useful in prioritizing repairs and replacements,
                      they have the disadvantage of being reactive in nature. In each case,
                      problems with the water system only become apparent after the pipes
                      have failed in some manner [7].
                         Table 8.3 provides a comparative listing of the different techniques
                      for inspecting metallic water pipes. Each technique is named and the
                      relative  advantages  and  disadvantages  of  the  technique  are  given.




                  Technique      Advantages           Disadvantages
                  Zone water     Cheap                Does not give the precise
                  audits         Covers large areas of a   location of leaks
                                 city quickly         Requires isolation of zones
                                 Allows for a comparison   Work must be performed at
                                 of water losses between   night
                                 individual districts  Only gives an overview of
                                 Useful as a screening   current problems
                                 process for other
                                 techniques
                                 Can be used to evaluate
                                 the effectiveness of
                                 repair programs

                 TABLE 8.3  Comparison of Diagnostic Techniques for Metallic Water Mains [7]
   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296