Page 106 - Cultural Studies Volume 11
P. 106

100 CULTURAL STUDIES

            thinking  among  most.  Of  course,  I  am  not  so  naive  as  to  believe  that  most
            professors  will  make  this  effort—many  white  professors  (and  even  a  few
            professors ‘of colour’) see the topic of race sensitivity as exhausted, contentious,
            tedious, tiresome and boring. However, in the aftermath of the O.J.Simpson trial,
            the  Million  Man  March  and  the  anticipation  of  whether  Colin  Powell  would
            announce  his  candidacy,  the  rude  intrusion  and  raw  saliency  of  race  thinking
            were  reminders  that  the  discourse  is  as  potent  and  explosive  as  ever.
            Parenthetically,  one  might  question  why  attention  to  gender  issues  in  the
            academy have not followed a similar course. But let me demonstrate this with a
            seemingly innocuous anecdote.
              The  notion  of  body  odour  is  culturally  specific  and  the  use  of  deodorant,
            perfumed soaps and so forth are a rather recent phenomenon, although those of
            us  who  were  born  or  raised  in  the  United  States  and  under  the  age  of  60  have
            probably  taken  it  for  granted  all  our  lives.  In  fact,  as  late  as  the  1950s,  most
            Americans did not take a shower on a daily basis whereas in the 1990s it is not
            unusual for people to bathe twice a day.
              In  a  course  whose  topic  was  visual  representation  and  the  production  of
            consumer  culture,  the  professor,  always  careful  to  use  correct  terminology  and
            instead  of  saying  ‘black’  made  a  point  of  saying  African-American,  told  the
            following story. A white woman, an American researcher, was working in Africa
            and conversing with a black African woman. The African woman kept backing
            away from the American, who in turn would make up for the distance by taking a
            step towards her. After a few moments of this pursuit and retreat, the American
            became  self-conscious  and  suddenly  asked,  ‘Am  I  doing  something  to  offend
            you?’, whereupon the African immediately answered, ‘Well, quite frankly, you
            smell like a corpse.’
              This narrative is less amusing than it appears, particularly when it is offered in
            a lecture by someone who has explicitly deferred any discussion of race (referred
            to as ‘multiculturalism’) to one separate week in the semester. I was intrigued by
            the fact that not one student in the large lecture hall laughed, although, frankly, I
            did chuckle. Since the topic of anything but white Americans rarely came up in
            this class, and the naturalization of whiteness was never interrogated, I suspect
            that  the  students  were  uncertain  how  to  respond  without  offending  anybody—
            indeed, they seem to be extraordinarily politically correct. The very fact that two
            women, a white American and a black African, were juxtaposed racially and not
            merely culturally, immediately signalled something serious, best left untouched,
            and under these circumstances no reaction at all was preferable to a disrespectful
            response.
              The professor went on to explain that whereas in America saturating the body
            in  perfumed  scents  was  a  positive  deterrent  against  body  odour,  in  Africa  this
            was reserved for the dead. The not very subtle implication, of course, was that
            the  black  African  woman  did  not  smell  as  ‘clean’  as  her  white  American
            counterpart. The professor’s conscious intention was to illustrate an example of
            cultural difference which has personal, as well as commercial, significance. The
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111