Page 173 - Culture Society and the Media
P. 173

NEGOTIATION OF CONTROL IN THE MEDIA  163
            questions concerning, for example, the nature of ‘creativity’, perceived needs and
            goals of individual producers, distinctions between ‘art’ and ‘craft’, and so on.
            The views of a  producer from the  original production team  responsible for
            Tonight’, one of the most successful of Britain’s early ‘formula’ shows, indicate
            a different set of priorities from that imagined by Coser:

              It was on ‘Tonight’  that I learned  the creative logic  of a  production
              team…. Although an idea can only originate in one person’s mind, it often
              emerges in a halfformed state: it can be greatly improved if six or seven
              people question it and add to it and elaborate it and refine it. In the same
              way, after the programme was over, six or seven people were much better
              than one at evaluating it, drawing conclusions, seeing new possibilities to
              exploit or errors to be corrected…. It makes a production team the best
              place for any novice to learn the craft…. It also offers him a variety of
              different roles—writer,  film director, researcher, studio director,
              interviewer, producer—with a correspondingly better chance of finding a
              suitable niche than he would have if apprenticed to a single producer. (Jay,
              1972, pp. 24–5)

            ‘Formula’ styles do not necessarily mean standardized trivia, any more than they
            apparently mean standardized roles: while the range of styles may be dictated by
            the organization and  technology of  the  medium,  the quality of the finished
            product may  have more to do with  the ability  of those  performing the major
            creative functions and with the general socioeconomic and socio-cultural milieus.
              Nevertheless, the power  of general economic  and commercial  factors in
            determining the creative freedom of individuals in the production process should
            not be underestimated. In times  of financial stringency, particularly,
            experimentation and originality tend to be subordinated to predominantly market
            considerations.

              Whereas, in the early sixties, a schedule of  ten to twelve  weeks was
              considered acceptable for a half-hour documentary, nowadays a standard
              series (such as  ‘Horizon’) will think itself lucky  to get  more than five
              weeks for an hour. But, as a fellow-editor remarked to me recently: ‘In
              those days we were developing the conventions. Now we merely apply
              them’. It is the technician’s pride in his workmanship which leads him to
              tolerate and hence to perpetuate, this condition…. He will show that he can
              do a good job regardless of the difficulties (for if he does not, someone else
              will)…. Haste necessitates the adoption of rules-of-thumb for calculating
              the viewer’s response, and this in turn requires the adoption of methods to
              which such calculation is appropriate…. It is really not good enough for
              me  to say that we employ  the commercial and authoritarian models of
              communication only as a shorthand, since shorthand is all we have time
              for. What has happened is that we have adopted towards our own work a
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178