Page 345 - Decision Making Applications in Modern Power Systems
P. 345

Heuristic methods for the evaluation of environmental impacts Chapter | 12  307


                In this chapter the EED problem will be used as NSGA-II with two
             objective functions—one is the cost of fuel and the other, emission index.



             12.2.4 The emission ratio as a parameter to assess the
             environmental contamination
             The production of energy by fossil fuels, industrial processes, and means of
             transport has a great influence on the environment, due to the deforestation
             and emissions (CO 2 ,NO x ,SO x ,C x H y , particulates, etc.); it is considered the
             main anthropogenic sources of pollution.
                The Kyoto Protocol resulted from the meeting of 160 nations in 1997
             in Japan to reduce emissions of gases that cause the greenhouse effect
             (CO 2 ,CH 4 , etc.) and encourage the development of new technologies and
             the implementation of clean sources power. Since then, the right to trade
             emissions (primarily CO 2 resulting from the burning of fossil fuels, whose
             use in developed countries is intensive) is gaining strength as a political
             strategy.
                The air pollutants originate mainly from incomplete combustion of
             fossil fuels. Those are classified into two types: primary and secondary.
             Primary pollutants are those emitted directly from sources to the
             atmosphere, highlighting particulate matter (smoke, dust, and mist), carbon
             monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), nitrogen oxides (NO and NO 2 ),
             sulfur compounds (H 2 Sand SO 2 ), hydrocarbons, and chlorofluorocarbons
             [11 13].
                With the introduction of emissions and ecological taxation market for the
             electricity sector, the development of decision-making methods for emissions
             trading or emission restrictions is becoming increasingly important, and
             many studies may decide to program generators for operation [14 18].
                Although there are many studies on CO 2 restrictions, they focus
             primarily on the problem of deciding the output level of each generator
             during the ED.
                However, to obtain an optimal solution, it is important to consider not
             only the dispatch level of each generating unit, but also the schedule (on/
             off), since the power minimum output, restrictions, and start-up influence the
             final solution of the cost/emission. So it is essential to consider the restriction
             problem of each unit in decision-making methods. In addition, most generat-
             ing unit studies, including CO 2 restrictions, are focusing on programming the
             solution that maximizes earnings per unit [24,25] but not in optimal solutions
             Pareto in reducing CO 2 [14,26,27].
                According [28],CO 2 emission allowances are usually given for a period
             of 1 year, while the time frame for programming is scheduled of 24 hours
             for several days, and restrictions have an effect only when the value of CO 2
             emissions became high. According [29] they believe that maximum profit is
   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350