Page 380 - Decision Making Applications in Modern Power Systems
P. 380

342  Decision Making Applications in Modern Power Systems



              TABLE 13.1 Pillar of specific improvements.
              Pillar of specific improvements           Evaluation/progress/
                                                        criteria
              Evaluation/progress/  Background/objective  Expected condition
              criteria
              1. Elaborate complete and  To increase the knowledge  Working group formed,
              detailed flow of the  of the whole operation and  operational flow
              operation, identifying the  to standardize the  completed in a clear and
              various auxiliary engines  knowledge of the  didactic way, equipment,
              and equipment, their  participants of the working  priorities and main risks
              respective priorities and  group, using the tools of  identified and being
              main risks. Note the  quality             known by all participants
              current conditions so that
              you can compare after the
              improvements
              implemented
              2. Identify the generation  Identify the distortions  Motors, auxiliary
              capacities in megawatt  between the actual and  equipment, and operations
              (MW) of each engine/  expected (standard or  identified with their
              plant—standard and real—  standard) of each engine/  nominal and actual
              and the current losses of  plant. Identify fuel and  capacities
              the operation, quantifying  lubricant/engine/plant  Criterion to analyze and
              through the Pareto chart  consumptions, knowing  identify the main losses of
                                   the performance of each
                                   one to be able to act on  the operation, stratify and
                                                        classify graphically in A,
                                   improvements
                                                        B, and C (Pareto)
              3. Investigate losses in  Allow to identify the  Use of the Analysis and
              detail according to the  fundamental causes of each  Problem Solving Method
              priority grades I, II, III of  selected loss, the actual  (APSM) tools to analyze
              the chart, presenting  operating conditions of each  and solve identified losses.
              alternatives for reducing or  motor/auxiliary equipment  PDCA, fishbone, 5W2H
              eliminating current losses  (clearances, paint, leaks,
              found for later comparison  instrumentation, working  Methodology being used
                                                        to investigate and
                                   environment conditions,  eliminate losses
                                   qualification of operators,
                                   necessary and available
                                   tools, etc.)
              4. Prepare detailed action  Organize the various  Plan of Action prepared by
              plan for the chosen losses  activities necessary to  the working group with
              and develop a schedule of  eliminate identified losses,  actions, responsible,
              activities, following the  in order of priority (from  deadlines and progress of
              APSM methodology     highest to lowest) and  the activities chosen in the
                                   investment (from lowest to  item above, through the
                                   highest)             APSM tools
                                                        Put the action plan into
                                                        practice and compare the
                                                        results before and after
                                                                 (Continued)
   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385