Page 140 - Decoding Culture
P. 140

RESISTING THE  D O M  I N ANT  133

          in social life, its embodiment in signifying practices, and its ideo­
          logical function in securing hegemonic domination. Of course, the
          Centre produced much more work than that,  some of it applying
          these general theoretical terms in specific areas, some striking out
          in different directions. Thus, the Race and Politics Group produced
          a critical examination of racism  in  Britain which,  although  con­
          cerned with both ideology and marxism, did not find ready-made
          theoretical resources in prevailing CCCS ideas:  ' t ilt was the frus­
          trating search for an inter-disciplinary, historical approach which
          was  geared  to  the  contemporary struggle against racism which
          forced  us  to  turn  our  own  hands  to  analysis'  (CCCS,  1982:  7) .
          Similarly, the Women's Studies Group found itself in some tension
          with other areas of the Centre's work, in consequence developing
          its own critical response in which, among other things, it sought 'to
          avoid  a general tendency in  CCCS towards an  unself-conscious
          use of theoretical language which is one element in perpetuating
          knowledge  as  the  property of the few'  (CCCS W o men's Studies
          Group,  1978:  8) . That response formed part of a wider feminist
          input into cultural studies which will be pursued in more detail in
          Chapter 6.
            As well as these growing general concerns with forms of domi­
          nation  and  subordination  other  than  class,  the  Centre  also
          produced  a  striking  range  of empirical work. They  documented
          diverse  features  of working-class  culture  (Clarke  et ai. ,  1979) ,
          engaged  with  the  move  toward more  ethnographically  oriented
          methods that had become so prominent in 1970s sociology (Hall et
           .
          at ,   1980: Part Two), and provided a foundation for well known and
          well  regarded  individual  studies such  as  those by Willis  (1977)
          and  Hebdige  (1979). As  these diverse examples indicate,  CCCS
          projects  were  hardly  homogeneous  even  during  the  Centre's
          heyday.  Nevertheless.  the  position captured in the  theoretical
          'snapshot'  of this chapter  does  represent the high  point  of the





                              Copyrighted Material
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145