Page 142 - Decoding Culture
P. 142

RESISTIN G   THE  D O M  I N ANT  135

          effectiveness of a dominant ideology, despite their evident concern
          with human agency and the 'struggle in discourse'. In this respect,
          it must be said, they reflected the widespread commitment to dom­
          inant ideology arguments in the marxist theorizing of the period.
          Yet, as Abercrombie et al.  (1980) forcefully argue, while still seek­
          ing  to  retain  a  broad  historical  materialist  position,  this
          presumption is  theoretically  problematic  and  empirically  inade­
          quate.
             Some of the consequences of presupposing a dominant ideology
          will have been apparent in this chapter's discussion of the CCCS
          attempt to focus semiotic accounts of signification through the lens
          provided by hegemony theory. We saw how that framework neces­
          sitated  a  concept  of  'preferred'  or  'dominant'  reading  if  the
          conjunction of structuralist analysis of signification and Gramscian
          marxism was to be maintained. We also saw how the  concept  of
          'preferred  reading'  restricted  the  capacity  of analyses  cast in  its
          terms to grapple with the conjoint issues of polysemy and the con­
          stitutive  role  played  by  social  agents  in  the  construction  of
          meaning. This does not mean, of course, that questions about ide­
          ology  and  domination  are  unimportant  or  inappropriate.  It
          suggests, rather, that what Abercrombie  (1990)  calls 'textual ide­
          ology' (that encoded in the text), 'ideology setting'  (the processes
          whereby  a text  is  encoded  with  ideology)  and  the  'ideological
          effect'  (on  audiences,  securing domination)  are connected  only
          contingently. '[I]ncoherence, diversity and pluralization character­
          ize  all  three  moments  of the  ideological  process,  making  each
          difficult to secure. This makes the proper articulation of textual ide­
          ology, ideology setting and ideological effect, necessary for popular
          culture to be in any sense ideological, even more difficult to secure.
          There is no principle that organizes the three moments' (ibid: 222).
             In the 1980s difficulties such as these led cultural studies away
          from the concept of (dominant)  ideology and toward new ways of





                              Copyrighted Material
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147