Page 146 - Decoding Culture
P. 146

J
                         G E N D E R E D   SUB E C TS, WOM  E N ' S   TEXTS   139
           studies,  so fluid  have  the two histories  been that there  always
           remains a considerable body of work, a residue, which does not fit
           easily into the categorial system.
             Here I shall adopt an alternative approach more in line with the
           analytic interests of this book, and certainly making no claims to be
           a comprehensive  summary of the many  points  of intersection of
           feminism and cultural studies. We have already seen some of the
           ways in which the history of cultural studies crystallizes around dif­
           fering forms of post-structuralism, in particular in the  alternative
           positions  found  in  Screen  theory and  in the  work  of the  CCCS.
           These two schools of thought, while coinciding in their desire to
           make use of the concept of ideology as a central device in grasping
           the social role of culture, articulate that task, and the theories nec­
           essary  for its  successful  application,  in very  different ways.  For
           Screen theory the principal emphasis is on the  process of subject
           positioning and, therefore, on the mechanisms (psychoanalytically
           conceived)  through which that positioning is achieved within cul­
           ture. Ideology here is predominantly a matter of the construction of
           subjects in texts and discourses. In the CCCS approach, ideology is
           viewed as an aspect of the process of securing hegemonic domi­
           nation, and subject positioning is conceived as only one element in
           a more complex interaction between different components of cul­
           ture.  Relations  between  textual  and  real  subjects,  discursive
           systems and  social agents,  and  culture  and  ideology,  are  much
           more socially negotiated here than in the apparent psychoanalytic
           determinism of classical Screen theory.
             Of course,  these  'snapshots'  of the  two  traditions  distort and
           simplify, freezing both Screen theory and CCCS work at one ana­
           lytic moment in their development. There are many perils in that
           procedure (not least the tendency to remove complex and nuanced
           ideas from  their  conceptual  context  and  thus  make  misunder­
           standing more likely) but the advantage for my present task lies in





                              Copyrighted Material
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151