Page 81 - Decoding Culture
P. 81

74  D E C O D I N G   C U L TURE

           connoted message is certainly coded, understood through the fil­
           ters  of our various  symbolic orders.  So we see  the  replication of
           reality denoted by the image, but we understand connotative mean­
           ings in consequence of the interaction of that image with cultural
           codes. Y e t photography commonly presents itself as a 'mechanical
           analogue'  without  a  second-order  message;  a  newspaper  photo­
           graph, for example, is pure denotation. Or is it?
             Barthes'  suggestion  is  that  the  claim  of  photographs  to  the
           denotative, to 'objectivity', is misleading: a naturalized product of
           'common sense'. In the act of reading a photograph we relate it to
           a body of signs, and it is in this process that what begins as a mes­
           sage without a code is assimilated by  its readers to a connotative
           system.  'Connotation,  the  imposition  of second meaning  on  the
           photographic message proper, is realized at the different levels of
           production of the photograph  (choice, technical treatment, fram­
           ing, lay-out)  and represents, finally,  a coding of the photographic
           analogue'  (ibid: 20). How this is managed is, for Barthes, a central
           question for semiology, and one with which he had been grappling
           for some years.  Hence,  of course,  the famous example from  his
           first (1957) attempt to think through his views, at this stage without
           use of the terms  denotation  and  connotation.  Let  me  quote it at
           length, since it so clearly embodies his central concerns.

             On the cover [of P a ris-Match  ,   a young Negro in a French uniform
                                     I
             is saluting, with his eyes uplifted, probably fixed on a fold of the tri­
             colour. All this is the meaning of the picture. But, whether naively or
             not, I see very well what it  signifies to me:  that France is a great
             Empire, that all her sons, without any colour discrimination, faith­
             fully serve under her flag, and that there is no better answer to the
             detractors  of an  alleged  colonialism  than  the  zeal  shown  by  this
             Negro  in  serving  his  so-called  oppressors.  I  am therefore again
             fa ced with a greater semiological system: there is a signifier, itself
             already f o rmed with a previous system (a black soldier is giving the
             French salute); there is a signified (it is here a purposeful mixture of





                              Copyrighted Material
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86