Page 82 - Decoding Culture
P. 82

ENTER STRUCT R ALISM  75
                                                       U
              Frenchness and militariness); finally, there is a presence of the sig­
              nified through the signifier.  (Barthes, 1993:  1 6)
                                                  1

           At this early stage Barthes was examining the process under the
           rubric of myth; his example  is  offered as an  instance of 'mythical
           speech'.  But the essence of his account is that there are two sys­
           tems of signification at work here whereby the sign of the primary
           system (the photograph of the soldier) becomes the signifier of the
           secondary,  or  mythical,  system.  In  the  essays  collected  in
           M y thologies it is this 'second-order semiological system' that forms
           Barthes' focus - the  metalanguage,  as he then calls it,  through
           which first-order signification comes to carry specific, naturalized
           meanings. In 'Myth Today'  (Barthes,  1993: 109-159) he begins to
           try abstractly to formulate that relationship, and later, in Elements
           of  Semiology, to extend his formal account in terms of the concepts
           of denotation and connotation.
              This  leads him to  untangle  two features  of second-order sys­
           tems that are conflated in his earlier discussions. Imagine that, as
           in Barthes' earlier example, we have two systems of signification,
           S I  and S 2 '   in which the former is an element of the latter.  Given
           that each is composed of signifiers and signifieds (or, in the terms
           Barthes  borrows  from  Hjelmslev,  each  comprises  a  plane  of
           expression and a plane of content)  it is necessary to  distinguish
           two forms of relation between them. S may be the signifier of the
                                            I
           second system, its plane of expression, in which case we are con­
           fronted with a plane of denotation  (S I ) and a plane of connotation
           (S ) '   Most commonly, Barthes suggests, this is to be found where
             2
           natural language forms S and, mounted on it, so to speak, we find
                                 }
           a second, wider connotative system (S ) , as is the case with litera­
                                            2
           ture.  But the  same  reasoning applies to  Barthes'  discussions of
           photography or to  his analysis of the Paris-Match cover, where
           one system is taken  as  the  denotative  foundation for a broader





                              Copyrighted Material
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87